You would think so, but you would be wrong. On two counts. First, if you can regularly identify low-risk entry points in directional price movement, then you don't actually need to be right at least 50% of the time for the approach to potentially be worthwhile. Is there something you're not getting here?You would think that if a tool was a source of edge, you’d get at least 50% of the questions right.
And, second, you conveniently mentioned the word tool. Tools are a good thing. For example, a screwdriver is great for screwing in screws. For hammering in nails, not so much. So each tool has a specific function. A trading "tool" may be a specific type of market price setup, which can then be used (traded) once such a setup occurs. However, you cannot use the trading "tool" indiscriminately at any time in the market any more than you can use a random workshop tool for any function. Did I really have to explain that to you? Surely you've heard about the need for traders to be patient enough to wait for the right moment, no? And that moment can easily vary from one person to the next. So when you present a chart, what, exactly, are you expecting from your respondents?
Last edited:
