Quote from denner:
I hear you loud and clear. Believe me, after more than a decade of what I consider "asset inflation at all costs" (save the blip in 08-09), I'd never press a short bet against the lunatic known as "bullet ben".
You outlined the fundamental forces at work "fundamental vs central planners". I thought the previous iteration of this nonsense was bad (i.e. the centrally planned real estate bubble), but this round has my head spinning.
Some thoughts about Japan, and why America is different.
Japans external debt (held by foreigners) is roughly 650 billion, or 5% of it's total sovereign debt. On the asset side, the BoJ holds over 3 Trillion in foreign securities. That means if foreigners dumped Japans debt, the BoJ could step in and defend the Yen -
several times over - through the sale of foreign assets and the purchase of Yen. Because of that balance of foreign assets to foreign liabilities, Japan is a net creditor.
America is the opposite. Roughly 5.4 Trillion of the national debt is held by foreigners (33%). The Federal Reserve, as far as I can tell, holds only ~700 Billion in foreign assets and gold, on it's balance sheet. That means if the FED continues to debase, there's no "dry powder" to intervene with and buy the dollar, if and when there's mass flight from US Treasury markets (and out of the USD). America is net debtor.
Net debtors, from recent history, seem to have trouble refinancing their debt at 90-130% debt to GDP. Capital markets balk, and then the shtf. Japan never had that problem because it's foreign assets far exceeded it's foreign liabilities. If the FED had ~11 Trillion in foreign assets on its books, theoretically, we could run up the national debt to 32 Trillion dollars, without worrying about a dollar collapse (assuming the current proportion of foreign ownership of US Treasuries remained constant). But that's not the case. What's interesting, is that the FED could have ran the exact same mercantile policy as Japan and China - printing dollars and accumulating foreign assets, instead of toxic mortgage paper. The net effect would be the same on the USD (debasement) but the FED would have more of an anchor to back-stop deficit spending and the USD. Of course, our banks would have crashed. And that's the only difference. It was about saving private banks, at the expense of the currency.