Since the 1930s when approval ratings began no president has won reelection with Trumps ratings and alot of people has been asked since the 1930sThose approval ratings are bs... its all in who they ask.
Please do your research with approval ratingsVanny.Also pay attention when reading.Trump didnt have a presidential approval rating when he faced Hillary,Hillary was ahead with the oddsmakers though.
A note with the oddsmakers,Vegas doesn't take presidential bets(I tried),so there isnt much money in the betting markets as many such as myself will not bet large sums of money with offshore sportsbooks or intrade type sites.Thier numbers are also all over the place with mutiple different sites having different odds.If people trusted these sites they would be arbing the price diffrences.

But those figures aren't all over the charts with the legit off-shore sites so you are 100% wrong about any arb opportunities
Well, you do have a point about lack of participation via Vegas, I'll give you that. Right now its probably a majority of Brits and Micks feeding those figures... and even a small number of them. I suspected that back in 2016 when I started watching them. But those figures aren't all over the charts with the legit off-shore sites so you are 100% wrong about any arb opportunities.
"Pay attention when reading". Yeah. There's the pot calling the kettle black.
EDIT:
I already addressed that.
Pay attention when reading.![]()
Warren will be the democrat nomnieeWhat gets lost in these endlessly repetitive discussions about polls and low-favorability ratings by past presidents and how they were defeated, etc, etc......is that the low rated presidents were beaten- not by the polls- but by a ONE-TWO PUNCH which consisted of their low favorability which the opposing party used to put up a strong opposing candidate. We don't see that this time do we?
As I have said ad naseum: "Unlike some, I fully concede that Trump is vulnerable just as he was in 2016 if the dems can find a good candidate." Have the dems done that yet?
WOMP......womp....womp
but by a ONE-TWO PUNCH which consisted of their low favorability which the opposing party used to put up a strong opposing candidate. We don't see that this time do we?