Some years back I was looking for (yet another) futures broker and settled upon Crossland (since bought out by Wedbush). Though a smaller broker, they had a decent ratio of "Adjusted Net Capital-to-Net Capital Requirement".... that's "shock cushion". They also told me they made their money only on "commissions and fees" and did not try to "do anything" with customer funds. By "doing something" with customer funds means trying to make some "float money" to the benefit of the firm. (Recall, that sort of thing is what got Refco and MF Global, others, in trouble. I had accounts at each of them when they had their difficulties... and those weren't the only ones for me over the years.) I don't know whether futures brokers decided trying to make float money was actually a bad business risk or whether the regulators enacted rules to prohibit it. In any case, it's been a while since I've heard of any problems like that. I'd like to believe that risk has been eliminated.
We all should do our own "due diligence".... but just because AMP is small doesn't mean they're a "problem waiting to happen".
FWIW...
We all should do our own "due diligence".... but just because AMP is small doesn't mean they're a "problem waiting to happen".
FWIW...
Last edited:
