I think this post by d08 shows the clear double standard in how we refer to areas with known poverty and low overall standards. d08 is not American so I view him as a fresh set of eyes to what he has seen and what he knows about America.
The Left uses Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi in this example as places that are poorly run by backward lower class white people. The responsibility in their minds rests solely with those white people who live there. They are not victims and their problems begin and end only with themselves.
Now take a look at what d08 said about Baltimore, Detroit, Newark and Chicago being "slums" and "worst areas of the states". To make such an observation as a white Republican is automatically racist and the Black Democrats who run those places will always be victims and the "bad guys" will always be white people.
The key takeaways are:
White run areas that are poor/low standards=Stupid inbreed racists who make bad choices.
Black run areas that are poor/high crime=Forever Victims, any shortcomings are due to whites being racist even if the majority of whites who surround the area are Democrats.
This is how responsibility is distributed among American Democrats.
You've applied your own racial lenses to what I said. I saw plenty of poor blacks in Alabama and Mississippi. I also saw plenty of poor whites. I didn't differentiate.
You make too many assumptions here and at least with me, you're wrong. I think US blacks are entitled and "forever victims" as you've said. It's a learned behavior for them.
They suggested the largest population centers, you interpreted that to mean worst areas. I agree with your interpretation, that is Dem ground zero btw.
No he didn't. South side of Chicago, why not the whole of Chicago? Why Newark and not Jersey City?
Besides, I don't see this as a political affiliation issue. I see it as a stupidity issue.