Yes, actually in the long run, it is good that we don't get involved in the elections of other countries.
If it is a good thing, then it would be good when China has the power to rig our elections in their best interest, right?
Is this to say that Hitler's rise to power was a good thing? Of course not, but unless we as a national favor another nation dictating our course of events...then we really have no business dictating the course of events of other nations.
This is where your logic fails repeatedly, simply because the self righteous are certain they are right to influence the lives of others, but can't stand it when someone tries to do the same to them.
Golden rule...
Like I've said before, as much as I think someone like Sarah Palin would destroy our country, even Ron Paul would send us back to the stone ages, I don't think that some outside force should rig our elections simply because they think it would be in their best interests to do so.
Free and fair, means just that.
I also find it odd that so called libertarians would even think of rigging the elections of other countries...as if it were their business to do so?
Quote from Rearden Metal:
So it's a good thing that no one rigged the elections against Hitler in 1933, and the German people were allowed to 'work out the process over time'?
This is somewhat of a devil's advocate type argument, since I do recognize the value of democracy. However, free and fair elections can be very risky in certain specific situations.