Some interesting big data views.
https://good-university.com/2017/08...media-and-the-2016-u-s-presidential-election/
"On the most widely covered topic of the election, immigration, Breitbart was the most prominent site. On Twitter, it is far above the rest."
My own English has become poor enough from years of emails etc. however it is unavoidable to conclude that the
far right have poorer vocabularies, spelling and punctuation. My older brother has dyslexia but that is not just what I see sometimes here on ET.
Twitter uncovered a side that was ignored by the intelligentsia, short burst messages have a big market and influence. The Donald of course has used it very successfully as it suits his style of sharp and simple.
There are several other research papers done and that all show one pattern, the left gets it's news from a broader range of sources than the right. Had Brietbart not existed, something else would be the largest red circle though not quite as large I guess.
Breitbart is engineered propaganda at a far higher level than we have seen previously. The far right will say, its just the best news for things I want to hear. For the central brained people its just that thing that asshole Bannon has "weponized". Huffington post can be a bit too partisan sickly also, often very.
Anyone who actually loves their country they will stop pecking and get to grips with this. We can be concerned about twitter but polarisation in congress started long ago. If we don't start to fix this, we're screwed. I imagine that 'the swamp' is largely caused by the appalling way politicians and parties must grovel to the wealthy for fundraising. How this can be done better is worth looking at as it could save the country.
Is the next/current step for the right that everyone studies and copies Breitbart?
Political mitosis in the United States
http://tywkiwdbi.blogspot.ie/2016/04/political-mitosis-in-united-states.html