Alan Dershowitz defends Spitzer

2C:
>so your system allows the FBI - ie taxpayer financed
>government officers paid to bust high crime type
>outfits - to disclose details of the private life of a guy
>who's paid for a few hookers to the media ahead of
>even being able to articulate what exactly are the
>serious crime-related charges against him if any,

A: Yes, now you're getting it.
B: how do you know what they can and cannot "articulate"? You only know what they "have and have not" articulated -- big difference.

>and that according to you doesn't violate his
>privacy rights?

Not according to *me* -- according to our *legal system* (and apparently you are two stupid to notice the several times repeated and not so subtle difference).

I'm a Ron Paul guy -- I'm for abolishing the FBI ... precisely because of the shit they pull.

>I am immune to your jurisdiction anyway.

Not if you come here and pick up a call girl. :-)

JB
 
Quote from I am...:

Do you have a copyright to use these quotes?

Jesus

Speaking of quotes. I saw a bumper sticker today that said "Would Jesus use his turn signal?" I thought "Self, there is a question for 'I am'". What say you? Do use your turn signals?
 
Quote from nutmeg:

Speaking of quotes. I saw a bumper sticker today that said "Would Jesus use his turn signal?" I thought "Self, there is a question for 'I am'". What say you? Do use your turn signals?

I crack myself up.
 
am just one stupid but thats ok....

riiiight, so we're agreed that if these fuckwit FBI cuntheads, with all due respect, can't come up with better stuff than bush's WMD evidence against iraq high-crime-wise, basically, the fuckers are guilty of violating his privacy rights plain & simple but your parody of a legal system doesn't recognize that as a punishable violation, not even a violation... its just the FBI, doing a mess of a job that may serve some political purpose but hey, i can't prove that!... wow... am i close??? i think i'm on to sthg here? am i? am i?


well his legal team's just started liaising with the FBI suits, right, and since they can trash him for years unpunished i guess their immediate options are somewhat limited... tuff...

i cld almost sympathize for the RP groupies out there...
 
Quote from Retired:

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/15567119/detail.html

Spitzer spent two years working for Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, who was quick to defend Spitzer Tuesday.

"These money laundering statutes were designed to catch organized crime, terrorists and not some guy to pay a prostitute," Dershowitz said.

Dershowitz said forcing Spitzer's resignation is wrong.

The law should apply to everybody. I hope he was not defending him because Spitzer share the same religious faith roots as him.
 
Quote from dnk:

I hope he was not defending him because Spitzer share the same religious faith roots as him. [/B]

Gotta love it. Everyone has a motive? Why did Alan defend Mike Tyson?
 
Quote from nutmeg:

Gotta love it. Everyone has a motive? Why did Alan defend Mike Tyson?

If he ever did, it is to make money and gain notoriety that comes when one defends a celebrity. If he ever did, it is likely in the context of a client attorney relationship.

R U a zionist nutmeg?
 
Quote from riskfreetrading:

W. would pardon him if he is convicted. Remember, he did it for Libby. Imagine if he is on his way out.


Why in the world would W get involved with bailing out a Dem. Libby was the chosen fall guy to protect Rove and Cheney. Spitzer has nothing to do with W.

You cant be that dumb can you?
 
Quote from dnk:

If he ever did, it is to make money and gain notoriety that comes when one defends a celebrity. If he ever did, it is likely in the context of a client attorney relationship.

R U a zionist nutmeg?
------------------------------

"it is to make money and gain notoriety that comes when one defends a celebrity."

No disrespect, but your answer was predictable.

"R U a zionist nutmeg?'

My sister is a bible scholar, if I need to know if I am a Zionist, I'll check with her. Thanks for asking though.
 
Back
Top