2C:
>so your system allows the FBI - ie taxpayer financed
>government officers paid to bust high crime type
>outfits - to disclose details of the private life of a guy
>who's paid for a few hookers to the media ahead of
>even being able to articulate what exactly are the
>serious crime-related charges against him if any,
A: Yes, now you're getting it.
B: how do you know what they can and cannot "articulate"? You only know what they "have and have not" articulated -- big difference.
>and that according to you doesn't violate his
>privacy rights?
Not according to *me* -- according to our *legal system* (and apparently you are two stupid to notice the several times repeated and not so subtle difference).
I'm a Ron Paul guy -- I'm for abolishing the FBI ... precisely because of the shit they pull.
>I am immune to your jurisdiction anyway.
Not if you come here and pick up a call girl.
JB