AI and Trading

Bullshit. Ai already embeds an incredible amount of learning, memorization at its basic level and on top of that reflects the full awareness of context and perspective. There is a reason leading researchers in this field are stepping on the breaks. It's getting slowly scary. We are not ready to accept and live with the consequences of an ai automated world. 80% of the workforce certainly isn't.

Well said

The drawback of ai is there's no wisdom, lessons learned, perspective.... it's just reshuffled facts without context
 
The ILM machine could have been classified as AI. It's gone, I believe, but lots of variants are still kicking. As Mark Brown pointed out - It was a form of data mining.
 
Italy is a very beautiful country to live, but is low on innovation and economics. Education standard is generally lower and the smart people often move up to the nordic or west countries in europe
That's why their cars manufacturing suck, like Ferrari or Alfa Romeo, Ducati motorcycles, how about the giga press that only Italy makes that everyone wants now that Tesla is using them... Dumb sobs, who move to the nordic because who wants to live in Italy anyway, right?
 
^^^^^ I seriously doubt that woman has made 100k total in all her years trading.
And why do you say that? She's on YouTube and making more money there than you do (and I have no idea who you are and what you do). What makes you say she doesn't also make more money than you trading?
 
Thanks @easymon1, it's interesting to see people sticking their fingers in ChatGPT and AI to see if and what it can do for traders. Some of the comments following her video were interesting as well, such as differentiating ChatGPT (regurgitating bot) from AI (learning bot), although she did suggest that communication with ChatGPT was getting easier as it was adjusting to her writing style, so there's some learning. One can argue that the greater the stored data, the more connections ChatGPT can make between data, although that may be what it can't do?
 
Back
Top