Those type of mistakes could suggest that you’re focusing on outcome over process.
It’s interesting that you brought up your high level of intelligence up front, without any kind of prompting. When traders experience the issues you describe, I don’t ever recall seeing anyone suggest that they could be attributed to a lack of intelligence. As a "registered armchair psychologist," that makes me wonder if a lot of your sense of self is tied to your high intelligence — and therefore, “being right”… which is “confirmed" by winning, i.e., “outcome.”
You also may be trying to pre-empt that possibility by noting your willingness to admit being wrong — but don’t those admissions generally come after-the-fact, and not in the heat of the moment, in-trade? In fact, stating that you “know all the psychology about humility and admitting when you’re wrong” seems to be additional validation of your high intelligence — because no truly intelligent, rational person would be unaware of the pitfalls of ego, or claim to be right 100% of the time. Once again, it's a "win-win" that validates your high intelligence.
If you agree with some of the above, perhaps you could consider focusing on *process over outcome*. Consider that it may be "more intelligent" to view trading from the standpoint of mathematical probability… and therefore, given that you already have a proven system, the truly intelligent approach would be to focus on process over outcome. Strive to “be right” 100% of the time by relentlessly following your rules on every trade, irrespective of individual outcomes, and score yourself accordingly.
It’s interesting that you brought up your high level of intelligence up front, without any kind of prompting. When traders experience the issues you describe, I don’t ever recall seeing anyone suggest that they could be attributed to a lack of intelligence. As a "registered armchair psychologist," that makes me wonder if a lot of your sense of self is tied to your high intelligence — and therefore, “being right”… which is “confirmed" by winning, i.e., “outcome.”
You also may be trying to pre-empt that possibility by noting your willingness to admit being wrong — but don’t those admissions generally come after-the-fact, and not in the heat of the moment, in-trade? In fact, stating that you “know all the psychology about humility and admitting when you’re wrong” seems to be additional validation of your high intelligence — because no truly intelligent, rational person would be unaware of the pitfalls of ego, or claim to be right 100% of the time. Once again, it's a "win-win" that validates your high intelligence.
If you agree with some of the above, perhaps you could consider focusing on *process over outcome*. Consider that it may be "more intelligent" to view trading from the standpoint of mathematical probability… and therefore, given that you already have a proven system, the truly intelligent approach would be to focus on process over outcome. Strive to “be right” 100% of the time by relentlessly following your rules on every trade, irrespective of individual outcomes, and score yourself accordingly.
