Quote from Pension_Admin:
No, I never did. I did some calculation on a spread sheet using my strategy and it showed that the result would be the same rather I average down or not.
So, I do the opposite.
PA
I actually did the statistics, and average down does work... But with averaging down you need to pay very close attention to your risk and position size and when you average down.
For example, let's take Apple. Say you invested in Apple at 220. Well averaging down at that level is a great way to break the bank. Unless of course you have enough money. It requires oodles of money.
On the other hand I have invested in Apple twice and I have averaged down multiple times. And each time made more than 70% returns. Though when I put the first chunk of change into the company is the question, and one that I am not willing to answer since my statistics were on the entire stock portfolio of the US exchanges.
Of the 100+ stocks I have invested in I would say only with 10 stocks I lost money (GM, C, TOM2, GRMN, ESLR, NWPX, and a few smaller positions). With GM, and C I cut my losses. Whereas with TOM, and GRMN I stopped adding to my positions since the size of the position exceeded my risk profile. Then when I had a chance I exited with some losses.
Averaging down requires a contrarian perspective, and one that very few people want to do. It requires catching falling knifes and leaving money on the table. Not an easy thing to do. I do it because it makes money consistently for me.
