SWC:
>But what would you do if you had one of your children
>in the restroom helping them go. And two pervs started
>fucking in the stall next to you?
>How would you feel about sex in a public bathroom at that
>point? Would you feel they had the right to it or not?
The "right" or legality of having sex in a 'public' stall is not the issue here. IMO, that issue can be (and has likely been) dealt with by whatever entity owns the restroom -- I'm guessing it IS illegal to have sex in the airport bathroom at MSP, and I hold that the owner has the right to make those choices.
At issue is whether the cops can stare through the cracks just for fun or if they must first establish probable cause.
I land squarely on the latter.
JB
>But what would you do if you had one of your children
>in the restroom helping them go. And two pervs started
>fucking in the stall next to you?
>How would you feel about sex in a public bathroom at that
>point? Would you feel they had the right to it or not?
The "right" or legality of having sex in a 'public' stall is not the issue here. IMO, that issue can be (and has likely been) dealt with by whatever entity owns the restroom -- I'm guessing it IS illegal to have sex in the airport bathroom at MSP, and I hold that the owner has the right to make those choices.
At issue is whether the cops can stare through the cracks just for fun or if they must first establish probable cause.
I land squarely on the latter.
JB