CAPM is way too simplistic for valuing a stock. In fact, I never saw that model used outside of a few classes I took a decade ago.
Stick with multiples.
Even in a recessionary environment, companies have earnings. How much would you pay for those earnings?
In a recessionary environment, growth comes at a premium. When everybody is growing at 50% YOY ; you have alternatives, but in a slow environment you don't see that sort of growth everywhere and woudl likely pay more for it. That is my bullish case for apple.
Stick with multiples.
Even in a recessionary environment, companies have earnings. How much would you pay for those earnings?
In a recessionary environment, growth comes at a premium. When everybody is growing at 50% YOY ; you have alternatives, but in a slow environment you don't see that sort of growth everywhere and woudl likely pay more for it. That is my bullish case for apple.
