AAPL - Earnings May 1

No more of a gamble than any other option strategy.

Depends on your definition of gamble.

I define gamble as:
  1. A trade that can lose 50-90% due to stock gap in wrong direction and/or volatility collapse.
  2. A trade that has no edge based on backtesting or historical patterns.
Example of a trade that is not a gamble:

Pre earnings straddle when you exit before earnings.

Those trades rarely lose more than 7-10%, and you can implement a stop loss of 15-20% and actually exit at a stop loss.

When you do a directional bet and stock goes against you after earnings, no stop loss will help you, and your loss is likely to be 50-90% (depending on strike and expiration)
 
nasdaq.com also has earnings history for free Then it’s quite possible to take that information and look at charts and see if the follow through is more than a day or not, often times the follow through lasts more than a day.

50/50 with greater than 2/1 R/R works for me, usually look for 3/1 plus on earnings. Other factors come to the equation like how often does the company beat, what’s the consensus going in. What has this earnings season brought, more positive surprises, how about the surprises within the sector etc. Apple has a tendency to surprise upward, BS earnings and forward outlook were priced in. So the statistics favor Apple while the consensus was against what’s statistically favorable. Then you’d look at the price action and see what’s truly possible. AAPL was towards the bottom of a trading range with plenty of upwards potential to the top of the range. So in my case you’d go in and find a vertical that would have reasonable price targets. Apple top of the range was $180 so I went in and chose 170-175 as this was well within the PA you could expect Apple to move. A spread of 5.00 on a 170 stock represents a mere 3% move required. Although this spread was slightly OTM when I purchased it so needing a 4% move. Why a vertical debit spread because options tend to have a volatility crush. The option I was long would decrease in IV value but so would the one I was short mitigating the issue.

Sure it was still a directional call but then you get into condors and butterflies to avoid the directional bias. Those are expensive and those are when big moves are necessary R/R selling or buying those isn’t really my taste. All said and done and all factors considered I’d say I’m okay with my 50/50 gamble.

I agree that if you do earnings bet, it is better to do with spread and not straight option. And your reasoning makes perfect sense. But reaction to earnings is completely unpredictable, and even a stock like AAPL has history of going down after perfectly good earnings. So it is still a gamble with very real possibility to lose up to 90%. Which means that position sizing should be really small, compared to more conservative trades where position sizing can be much larger.
 
Yes ....... to the 100% loss of the debit paid for the options.
Well, to me entering a trade and knowing in advance that I can lose 100% and nothing I can do about it is a gamble. I like trades where my losses are limited to 20-30% even if I'm wrong. Sure, my gains might be smaller as well - but I can allocate 10% to my trades knowing that worst case I'm risking 2-3% of my account. Can you say the same about those directional trades?
 
Back
Top