A thought on the people that came up with global warming & evolution

Quote from Eight:

LOL!! Now that tells me what we're up against in an argument like this... cross calibration is not the use of two methods.. it's using deception and calling it calibration... calibration is defined as comparison to a known standard, the deceptive calibration is comparison of two unknown things to each other... you've taken the discussion off course actually, that is the hallmark of the evolutionists, they cannot stay on the topic.. probably because they simply cannot imagine that they are wrong...

So the radiometric dating is wrong, the radiocarbon method of zeroing instruments is wrong, the cross verification of strata age is wrong, the geologic strata is wrong, the index fossils are wrong, the measurements of lead found in zircon crystals is wrong, and each of the potassium-argon, rubidium-strontium, samarium-neodymium, luteium-hafnium, rhenium-osmium, thorium-lead, and the two uranium-lead dating methods are wrong.

But we should believe in a cow's leg stuffed in a boot.
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

Atheists usually come up with some zippy one-liners that are simplistic, so I thought I would give you one since atheists are always telling us Christians to "go read a book" or "go get an education" So here goes...

Knowledge = power

Power leads to corruption.

Therefore knowledge leads to corruption.


The more knowledgeable these scientists are, the more corrupt they are. How can you believe them then?


WHY OH WHY DO YOU HATE SCIENCE!?!?!?!
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

I don't think I'd put global warming and evolution in the same camp. Even with a couple of holes in it, evolution is pretty much a given, whereas global warming is pure wild eyed speculation.
Science is another example of where the radical left has hi-jacked something and called it their own. There aren't many radical leftists, but they're loud, well funded, and have placed some people in key political & media positions to maintain the flow of bullshit.



It's the same HAMMER 'they' wish to bash you over the head with until you submit.

I'm almost entirely non-religious in my day-to-day, but I'll say one thing, if I ever do form my own religion, I'll disallow all atheists. (With very few exceptions, 'atheists' are THE MOST detestable of all people)
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

1. How do i live for millions of years so i can observe it for myself.[?]

The trick is to choose life forms that have much shorter lifespans than yours, so that you don't have to live for millions of years. You live for millions of their "years" instead.
 
Nonsense. I can prove a circle can't be squared or that my coffee is not molten gold. Not very much of a "free thinker" are you?
Quote from Free Thinker:

any scientist knows you cant prove a negitive
 
Back
Top