Quote from Eight:
LOL!! Now that tells me what we're up against in an argument like this... cross calibration is not the use of two methods.. it's using deception and calling it calibration... calibration is defined as comparison to a known standard, the deceptive calibration is comparison of two unknown things to each other... you've taken the discussion off course actually, that is the hallmark of the evolutionists, they cannot stay on the topic.. probably because they simply cannot imagine that they are wrong...
So the radiometric dating is wrong, the radiocarbon method of zeroing instruments is wrong, the cross verification of strata age is wrong, the geologic strata is wrong, the index fossils are wrong, the measurements of lead found in zircon crystals is wrong, and each of the potassium-argon, rubidium-strontium, samarium-neodymium, luteium-hafnium, rhenium-osmium, thorium-lead, and the two uranium-lead dating methods are wrong.
But we should believe in a cow's leg stuffed in a boot.