A step back into the Dark Ages

Quote from Gabfly1:

... plumb the depths of stupidity by revealing my identity to ET's Right Wing crazies...
More...
What you afraid of Gabby? Hackers? Getting your candy ass kicked?
Stalkers? A knock on your door late at night...
 
Quote from Lucrum:

What you afraid of Gabby? Hackers? Getting your candy ass kicked?
Stalkers? A knock on your door late at night...
More...
What person in his right mind wouldn't welcome such an addition to his social life? :p

As for the "candy ass" part, you really should keep your fantasy life to yourself. Or at least save it for your coming out party.
 
You've since retracted it.
Quote from Gayfly1:

Interesting. Some of your brethren believe I have never admitted to an error. Perhaps you could set them straight.
More...
 
Heterosexual Americans don't think of that term the same way you do.
Quote from Gayfly1:

As for the "candy ass" part, you really should keep your fantasy life to yourself. Or at least save it for your coming out party.
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

You've since retracted it.
More...
I've made a number of errors to which I have owned up in full, both under my current user name and my previous one. The issue you refer to wasn't one of them.
 
You mean the one where you got it wrong, then admitted it, then flip-flopped and tried to obfuscate by accusing me of "false pedantry" for insisting on the Constitution's definition of treason instead of the ever changing definition in your head?

Hoodooman, thank you for the clarification. "Treasonous" should be replaced with "seditious" in the thread title and text. Much appreciated.

As I noted earlier, hoodooman aptly pointed to the distinction between treason and sedition, for which I am grateful. The mistake was mine. Therefore, and I repeat, let's go with sedition.

No. I got it right the first time. You are just too busy engaging in false pedantry to recognize it.


Quote from Gayfly1:

I've made a number of errors to which I have owned up in full, both under my current user name and my previous one. The issue you refer to wasn't one of them.
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

...flip-flopped...
More...
I already explained why I chose to revert to my original assessment. If you choose to ignore my rationale because doing so better suits your narrative, then you just keep doing whatever floats your boat, just as you always do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top