A replacement for Jesse Jr.

Quote from Lucrum:

Yeah, on the left side of the IQ bell curve.

Check out this self delusion and stupidity:


He actually believes he's good at dodging questions.

And you actually believe you are NOT a troll.:D :D

Start that journal, troll.:)
 
Quote from Lucrum:

What it is with African's and electing convicted felons to public office?
Peer bonding. They want to elect someone like themselves and their friends and relatives.

RCG should find a nice black part of IL to run for Congress. They love habitual liars, too.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:



Start that journal, troll.:)

I started the TST Combine, the same one you agreed to do.
Where's yours?



attachment.php





attachment.php
 

Attachments

Quote from RCG Trader:

I never saw the question. Sorry about that. Now, you are asking your question in a vacuum and trying to divorce yourself from the historical context that must be considered when asking such a question.

If you are not aware of this context, you will not understand the answer.:)

Sure ya saw it. I originally wrote in this thread

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Blacks do well in politics with blacks. Period.

To which you responded:

Quote from RCG Trader:

This statement is clearly a form of denial, but considering your mental state, I understand.:)

And I put forth:

Quote from Tsing Tao:

I don't know about that, but I will happily withdraw my comment if he, or anyone else for that matter, can show me one example where an election at the mayor/governor/congress/senate level between an African American and a White guy ended up with the White guy getting a larger portion of the African American vote.

One.

If no example can be provided, then it is a pretty safe assumption to make that blacks vote black, regardless of record.

which you never answered.

Now you're trying to get all ambiguous and blurry with your response about context and answering questions in a vacuum in order to hedge your response - you know you have to respond, but you also know you have no evidence to refute (despite wanting that evidence desperately).

You also know the premise of the idea is correct, but you hate that it is so - blacks will vote race and not look at the opponents from a standpoint of who is better qualified. They'd rather put a convicted criminal in charge because he's black, then someone who is white and qualified for office. There are, of course, exceptions to this as some blacks are intelligent voters and take the responsibility of casting their vote seriously, but the vast majority do not.

Instead of just saying "It is true, and I wish it weren't, but here is what needs to change...etc" you try to say it's not true when all the evidence is against you.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Sure ya saw it. I originally wrote in this thread



To which you responded:



And I put forth:



which you never answered.

Now you're trying to get all ambiguous and blurry with your response about context and answering questions in a vacuum in order to hedge your response - you know you have to respond, but you also know you have no evidence to refute (despite wanting that evidence desperately). ....

RCG wannabe Trader, busted, outed, punked and owned - again.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Sure ya saw it. I originally wrote in this thread



To which you responded:



And I put forth:



which you never answered.

Now you're trying to get all ambiguous and blurry with your response about context and answering questions in a vacuum in order to hedge your response - you know you have to respond, but you also know you have no evidence to refute (despite wanting that evidence desperately).

You also know the premise of the idea is correct, but you hate that it is so - blacks will vote race and not look at the opponents from a standpoint of who is better qualified. They'd rather put a convicted criminal in charge because he's black, then someone who is white and qualified for office. There are, of course, exceptions to this as some blacks are intelligent voters and take the responsibility of casting their vote seriously, but the vast majority do not.

Instead of just saying "It is true, and I wish it weren't, but here is what needs to change...etc" you try to say it's not true when all the evidence is against you.

No, I do not really. I understand why any brown person would be distrustful of any white person in our present society.

But my answer was going to be that black people vote for black people because they are democrats.

And to answer your question, J C Watts. How much of the black vote did he get?:)
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

I understand why any brown person would be distrustful of any white person in our present society.
And I understand why every white person needs to be distrustul of any black/brown person in our present society.
 
Back
Top