A message to some day traders.

Ladies and gentlemen, this man is the epitome of epistemic arrogance.

Here we have all the great investors and traders giving luck its due respect in their success, but to Volpri, no such thing exists. He knows what all the greats traders & investors don't know. Jim Simons, whom has the enviable track record in financial market history as far as public knowledge goes, crediting luck its due respect, but nope, not Volpri. Nassim is wrong, Simons is wrong, Buffet is wrong, Cooperman is wrong, Munger is wrong. Sh*t everybody is wrong!
“Everybody is wrong” That is a correct assessment if they believe in luck. You might have finally gotton lucky and got something right! Congratulations! Yes they are wrong. Their status in life has nothing to do with it. Whoever, believes in luck is ..well yes..WRONG..MISTAKEN ...no matter how successful or unsuccessful they are in life. It is an erroneous belief and will always be. Sorry.

PS. I might be a tad bit arrogant. If so, it is probably just an intentional hyperbole.
 
“Everybody is wrong” That is a correct assessment if they believe in luck. You might have finally gotton lucky and got something right! Congratulations! Yes they are wrong. Their status in life has nothing to do with it. Whoever, believes in luck is ..well yes..WRONG..MISTAKEN ...no matter how successful or unsuccessful they are in life. It is an erroneous belief and will always be. Sorry.

PS. I might be a tad bit arrogant. If so, it is probably just an intentional hyperbole.

yikes, you've made it clear that you don't know what luck is.

Walton family... creates baby, baby gets inherited a billion dollars. We say, wow.. lucky baby. From my perspective, that's exactly what it is. Of course, only God knows WHY that specific baby was destined to be birthed into a billion dollar inheritance.
 
It's at 66 right now, it's like a trade that makes you go "it can't go any further" and then it does.

Why are you updating him, he knows that, he recently commented. He isn't wrong. He said at least 50 pages.
 
I’ll try to leave but it is really hard....


I stay, precisely because I am humble. You leave, precisely because you're arrogant. All your posts have been utterly useless with quality behind them. Just a bunch of images and youtube videos like that one other guy that comes in with his 2 cents, posts a youtube video then leaves for 2 days only to come back with another useless youtube video.
 
Why are you updating him, he knows that, he recently commented. He isn't wrong. He said at least 50 pages.

Seeking attention I see as if you don't have enough of it.
Guess what, I bought beer today, I paid it with money only from the market. Next you'll call it a fluke, that's cool as well, as long as the fluke lasts for at least 50 years - I really don't care.
 
Seeking attention I see as if you don't have enough of it.
Guess what, I bought beer today, I paid it with money only from the market. Next you'll call it a fluke, that's cool as well, as long as the fluke lasts for at least 50 years - I really don't care.

Is that what you think I am doing, calling all earnings from markets a fluke. Move along.
 
Ladies and gentlemen, this man is the epitome of epistemic arrogance.

Here we have all the great investors and traders giving luck its due respect in their success, but to Volpri, no such thing exists. He knows what all the greats traders & investors don't know. Jim Simons, whom has the enviable track record in financial market history as far as public knowledge goes, crediting luck its due respect, but nope, not Volpri. Nassim is wrong, Simons is wrong, Buffet is wrong, Cooperman is wrong, Munger is wrong. Sh*t everybody is wrong!
Funny you quote (and worship at the temple of) Talib ad nauseam but drop names of Buffett, Simons, Cooperman, Munger on luck ... without so much as a single word quoted.

Could it be because they (btw Cooperman has been known to use TA now and then, ask Tom DeMark) refer to their lot in life and not to particular modes of operation?
 
Back
Top