A Guide To Political Correctness

That's the difference. So Islamic fundamentalists should be blamed for a terrorist attack. Not all Muslims or the whole Muslim community. Why aren't Whites asked to police their extremists, but Muslims are?

What makes an Islamic fundamentalist? The fact that he kills someone?
 
Why is a typical Muslim blamed for an Islamic terrorist?

Why isn't a typical Christian blamed for an Evangelical who blows up an abortion clinic?

When was the last time an evangelical blew up an abortion clinic? How many times has that happened in the last 20 years?

You still haven't answered my very important question. What makes an Islamic Fundamentalist a terrorist? You said "Islamic Fundamentalists should be blamed for a terrorist attack", not all muslims.
 
I suppose this dialogue passes for deep thought at his high school. Maybe his Ivy League university, who knows.

I have already pointed out one obvious difference, ie muslim clerics say this is a religious duty and a substantial percentage of "moderate" muslims agree with them. They just lack the stones to do it themselves.

Another difference is that we are not inviting in large numbers of foreign white supremacists who are violence prone. If we were, you'd bet liberals would be complaining. You cannot argue with the fact that more muslims means more terrorism, more sexual assaults, more female genital mutilation and more child molestations. We don't want it here. We may be stuck with homeground white extremists, etc but there is no reason to allow in more muslims knowing the problems they bring.
 
When was the last time an evangelical blew up an abortion clinic? How many times has that happened in the last 20 years?

You still haven't answered my very important question. What makes an Islamic Fundamentalist a terrorist? You said "Islamic Fundamentalists should be blamed for a terrorist attack", not all muslims.
 
At the tender age of 69 Ted Nugent gets his ''wake-up'' call.


Ted Nugent says he’s seen the light after Virginia shooting: ‘We have got to be civil’


Ted-Nugent-interviewed-by-KENS-TV-on-Feb.-18-2014..jpg


Singer Ted Nugent claims that he has seen the light and will stop using toxic rhetoric to attack Democrats.

In a Thursday interview with 77WABC Radio, Nugent swore that he has “reevaluated” his language and would refrain from saying “anything that can be interpreted as condoning or referencing violence.”

“At the tender age of 69, my wife has convinced me I just can’t use those harsh terms,” he admitted. “I cannot and will not and I encourage even my friends/enemies on the left, in the Democrat and liberal world, that we have got to be civil to each other.”

Nugent is well known for attacking Democrats, particularly former Secretary Hillary Clinton, former President Barack Obama and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). He once referred to the former president as “a piece of sh*t” and “sub-human mongrel” and urged him to “suck on my machine gun.” He then went on to encourage Clinton to “ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless b*tch.”

As for Sanders, Nugent said that the Democratic presidential candidate could “eat sh*t and die.”
 
Back
Top