Nothing to argue, your post was idiotic. The crime had nothing to do with race. I know you lefties love to make everything about race, but in reality very few crimes are racially motivated. Religion also had nothing to do with it. Muslim isn't a religion BTW. My assessment stands, dumbest post of the day goes to you.
A Guide To Political Correctness
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
A crime perpetrated by a White supremacist has everything to do with his race, but whites aren't lumped in with him. An attack by an Islamic fundamentalist has everything to do with his religion, but the entire group of people practicing that religion bare the blame.
Where you think the shooter is a leftist "resister," so all leftist resisters are murderers?
Read the news moron.
Good analysis.
No, not all whites, but white supremacists would definitely be lumped in and blamed.
The test is this: if you commit an atrocity claiming to represent a group, we are entitled to look at what that group is doing. Whites, as a group, are not advocating terrorism. Many muslim leaders are however and they are calling it a religious imperative. See the difference?
There is nothing to analyse. You seem incapable of comprehending basic facts.
This may have something to do with the fact that the religion in question calls - in it's holy book - for the massacre of infidels (people who do not share the religion). So when violence actually does occur, we go "well there you have it."
The bible says a lot of horrible things too. Most religious texts say horrible things. What makes the Koran and Muslims different?
That's the difference. So Islamic fundamentalists should be blamed for a terrorist attack. Not all Muslims or the whole Muslim community. Why aren't Whites asked to police their extremists, but Muslims are?