Quote from Ricter:
With all due respect to the estimable Mr. Robbins, imho that completely dodges the issue! For example, let's say that at this moment I want to have a smoke more than I want to quit. What's his mechanism to reverse that? Sounds to me like he's just saying "reverse it".
I smoked for twenty years and quit 3. 5 years ago. I think about smoking all the time.
I know what you mean, Ricter, but I like Robbins' statement. At least it cuts out all the b.s. about acupuncture, the Patch, hypnotism, nicotine gum, and that joke of PC rhetoric, 'harm reduction', which apparently means keep smoking but feel better about yourself because you've acknowledged that you have a problem.
Rearden might weigh in here re: addictions. The absolute bottom line is that you have to find a way to go from the minute you get up until the moment you fall asleep, without smoking. In the end, your 'want' to have a smoke, which is greater than your 'want' to quit, is, at it's base, psychological. I don't think tobacco fulfills any of the needs the opiates do in Rearden's conception of substance use. The bottom line is that it takes discipline, and that is something that some people don't have and will never have. It's the same with weight loss. There is no reason that any individual can't lose weight, barring a specific medical condition which, when it exists, usually causes morbid obesity, not just overweight and flabby. Most people just aren't interested in doing the hard work necessary to lose the weight.
I guess there's an argument to be made that if it's simply a matter of competing 'desires', as you seem to suggest, that there is a behavioural solution. If it's a neurochemically-determined compulsion, then simply wanting to quit won't work. I guess I just don't believe that it's the latter for the majority of smokers.
If anyone is interested in knowing how I quit, you can PM me and I'd be glad to spell it out.