https://www.ft.com/content/34ae54c0-e20b-11e6-9645-c9357a75844a
The currency jumped after the 11-member court ruled against the government’s claim that it was not required to consult parliament, before then retreating. In mid-session trade it was down 0.5 per cent at $1.2464, remaining under the $1.25 mark, and under levels it held before the decision. Stephen Gallo, European head of currency strategy at the Bank of Montreal, said:
“Keep in mind that a loss for the government was already baked in. Therefore, those that bought sterling in anticipation of this ruling may take profit.” The pound hit a month-high on Monday in the run-up to the ruling — taking up around 2 per cent since the start of the year — as investors anticipated the outcome. That rally left the currency vulnerable to selling as the decision was announced. Theresa May, prime minister, pledged in her “clean Brexit” speech last week that parliament would get a vote on the final deal. However, the prospect of deeper scrutiny in Westminster before Article 50 is triggered has helped support the UK currency.
One explanation for the pound’s muted reaction on Tuesday was the court’s decision that Mrs May’s government does not have to consult Scotland and the other devolved assemblies before triggering Article 50, removing another potential delay before the start of official divorce proceedings with the EU.
p.s.
Come on, "the loss for the govt was already baked in", You kidding me... I carried out research on this for about a week and there was no single news report pointing out that the loss was already baked in. Instead, they, including analysts all predict the pound would appreciate upon the verdict.
These guys look at words one by one. Just crazy.
I did take 3 commercial law papers but man, I did not know hedge funds (or market makers) have lawyers in their trading team.
It just left me bad taste in my mouth.
Well, I move on ...