I am not any more convinced than I was when I started reading this thread. Lucrum did give me pause for thought, after the aircraft discussion, but other than that all I see is a pissing contest and no real discussion. Mav had a few good points, but he's a well-spoken guy anyway. And Optional made one or two. I'm outta here, hope you come to some sort of resolution.......lol.
9/11 Truthers
- Thread starter Maverick74
- Start date
The only fool here is you - too busy to read a piece of factual evidence.
The reason is - you can't read or comprehend anything not reported by Fox News. You and Mav are a real Algonquin Roundtable.
Another guy who says 'why can't anyone answer my question?'. And then when it is answered, he fires back with a quirky video. Yay!
You are a nut! Anti american! Huffington Post regular!
Hahahahahhaahaha.
What are you morons in the 5th grade?
You are the worst that good ol America has to offer.
Tough guy typing on his momma's computer.
What does a sheep believe when he's being led to slaughhter?
Just look in the mirror buddy and go 'Baaaaaaaaaa'.
The reason is - you can't read or comprehend anything not reported by Fox News. You and Mav are a real Algonquin Roundtable.
Another guy who says 'why can't anyone answer my question?'. And then when it is answered, he fires back with a quirky video. Yay!
You are a nut! Anti american! Huffington Post regular!
Hahahahahhaahaha.
What are you morons in the 5th grade?
You are the worst that good ol America has to offer.
Tough guy typing on his momma's computer.
What does a sheep believe when he's being led to slaughhter?
Just look in the mirror buddy and go 'Baaaaaaaaaa'.
Since your IQ is probably lower than a retarded orphan's, let me cut n paste an important line from PNAC's report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses.
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing eventââlike a new Pearl Harbor"
PNAC's January 16, 1998 letter to President Clinton, which urged him to embrace a plan for "the removal of Saddam Husseinâs regime from power,"[10] and the large number of members of PNAC appointed to the Bush administration as evidence that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was a foregone conclusion.
Signatories to the PNAC's January 16, 1998 letter to President Clinton (and some of its other position papers, letters, and reports) included such later Bush administration officials as Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Richard Armitage, and Elliott Abrams.
On a side note:
From CNN 2004-
The Bush administration began planning to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq within days after the former Texas governor entered the White House three years ago, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told CBS News' 60 Minutes.
"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," O'Neill told CBS, according to excerpts released Saturday by the network. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap."
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing eventââlike a new Pearl Harbor"
PNAC's January 16, 1998 letter to President Clinton, which urged him to embrace a plan for "the removal of Saddam Husseinâs regime from power,"[10] and the large number of members of PNAC appointed to the Bush administration as evidence that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was a foregone conclusion.
Signatories to the PNAC's January 16, 1998 letter to President Clinton (and some of its other position papers, letters, and reports) included such later Bush administration officials as Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Richard Armitage, and Elliott Abrams.
On a side note:
From CNN 2004-
The Bush administration began planning to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq within days after the former Texas governor entered the White House three years ago, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told CBS News' 60 Minutes.
"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," O'Neill told CBS, according to excerpts released Saturday by the network. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap."
Oh Jeez, not the IQ thing again. Trust me, you don't even want to go there.
You're a nut. Nobody is going to read a reference you provide.
The reason you are able to believe the US government would slaughter its citizens is that you are a pakistani or some other type of undesireable foreigner. Naturally a piss-head wouldn't understand US national pride or patriotism. Just another foreigner from a filthy village who is obsessed with events in a country he could never realize success in. Nothing to see here, move along.
Tell me, how do you get the smell off of your hands? Lemon juice?
Amazing. Your idiocy is truly without bounds. How many times can a person be wrong in one thread?
FIN
FIN
Quote from 377OHMS:
Oh Jeez, not the IQ thing again. Trust me, you don't even want to go there.
You're a nut. Nobody is going to read a reference you provide.
The reason you are able to believe the US government would slaughter its citizens is that you are a pakistani or some other type of undesireable foreigner. Naturally a piss-head wouldn't understand US national pride or patriotism. Just another foreigner from a filthy village who is obsessed with events in a country he could never realize success in. Nothing to see here, move along.
Tell me, how do you get the smell off of your hands? Lemon juice?
Haven't been wrong in this thread once. You have been ID'd and fully characterized as a foreign hater of the United States and as a lunatic conspiracy theorist. Obscuration isn't going to help you now, you've supplied a complete profile of yourself.
You don't seem to recognize the extent to which you've been shown to be a fool and a nutcake. Nonetheless you drone on and on about stuff nobody cares about. Not too clever.
Then you start talking about IQ. I would guess you are right around the world mean IQ of 100 points. I rather think I'm not off by more than 0.5 sigma meaning 90-110. Something of a challenge for you to make a white collar living I imagine. As I said, by now your wife will have realized she is married to a loser. Perhaps she'll win the lottery and be rid of you. We all hope for the best for her.
I do not consider myself a truther but imo Bush,Cheney and other old greedy fucks let terrorists in the country knowing they will blow up something but never guessed or imagined the magnitude of what they could do. They were thinking some car bombs or hijacked plane with hostages. They underestimated terrorists ability completely.