9/11 Truthers

Quote from Larson:

... I know one thing I'll never understand is why was our Air Force not in the airspace. No fighters in the air. If we have the technology to intercept an incoming ICBM., this doesn't add up. The Pentagon? Give me a break. They flew it into the Pentagon unchallenged. And the Carlyle-bin Laden-Bush connection stinks. All I can say is if it was legitimate, it was a masterful operation, flawless, by these terrorists.
Why would there be any fighters in the air? We weren't at war, the warning signs of a possible attack had been overlooked, EVEN if we were expecting an attack. When will it happen? Where? The attack was already well underway before most realized what was happening. Even then it takes time for a request from civilian authorities for military fighters to reach a squadron. (The cold war had been over for years.) Then it takes time for the powers to be to decide whether to shoot down an airline full of innocent civilians. Not to mention the airliners had disappeared from radar contact, (they descended to low altitude and turned off their transponders) how can they vectors fighters when they don't know where the airliners are?

While most of the attack did go well for the terrorists it wasn't 'flawless", the one that crashed in PA for example.
And their success probably had as much to do with the element of complete surprise as well as our civilian aviation/FAA not being set up to deal with such an event at the time. In fact knowing the incompetence of our government I'd bet it's not much better now.
IOW our multiple failures lost the "battle"/attack as much as their efforts won it.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Why would there be any fighters in the air? We weren't at war, the warning signs of a possible attack had been overlooked, EVEN if we were expecting an attack. When will it happen? Where? The attack was already well underway before most realized what was happening. Even then it takes time for a request from civilian authorities for military fighters to reach a squadron. (The cold war had been over for years.) Then it takes time for the powers to be to decide whether to shoot down an airline full of innocent civilians. Not to mention the airliners had disappeared from radar contact, (they descended to low altitude and turned off their transponders) how can they vectors fighters when they don't know where the airliners are?

While most of the attack did go well for the terrorists it wasn't 'flawless", the one that crashed in PA for example.
And their success probably had as much to do with the element of complete surprise as well as our civilian aviation/FAA not being set up to deal with such an event at the time. In fact knowing the incompetence of our government I'd bet it's not much better now.
IOW our multiple failures lost the "battle"/attack as much as their efforts won it.

Lucrum, in the movie "Top Gun" Tom Cruise can go from screwing Kelly McGillis to 30k feet over the indian ocean in the time it takes you to order your popcorn at the theater. Isn't that how it works in real life?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Why would there be any fighters in the air? We weren't at war, the warning signs of a possible attack had been overlooked, EVEN if we were expecting an attack. When will it happen? Where? The attack was already well underway before most realized what was happening. Even then it takes time for a request from civilian authorities for military fighters to reach a squadron. (The cold war had been over for years.) Then it takes time for the powers to be to decide whether to shoot down an airline full of innocent civilians. Not to mention the airliners had disappeared from radar contact, (they descended to low altitude and turned off their transponders) how can they vectors fighters when they don't know where the airliners are?

While most of the attack did go well for the terrorists it wasn't 'flawless", the one that crashed in PA for example.
And their success probably had as much to do with the element of complete surprise as well as our civilian aviation/FAA not being set up to deal with such an event at the time. In fact knowing the incompetence of our government I'd bet it's not much better now.
IOW our multiple failures lost the "battle"/attack as much as their efforts won it.


Being a pilot you would have a better grasp of the situation than I would. So, we are still vulnerable to something like this, once they get in the air? Somehow, I just can't grasp that the best Air Force in the world can't protect it's own airspace, particularly over the capital.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Amazing, not one of these truthers can answer my very simple question. This place is a joke.

Your question was moronic to say the least.

Since you've "done alot of reading", you would have known that the economy was ALREADY in the tank in the days leading up to 9/11. Greenspan had already orchestrated a series of intra-day rate cuts to try and offset the so-called "deflationary effects" of the dot.com bust.

As a so-called student of history, you would also know that our particular brand of "Military Keynesism" requires us to be engaged in near constant warfare to stimulate the economy. What better way to draw us into another prolonged war than 9/11 (not even going to argue the false flag issue, don't care to get into that aspect).

As we all know, the period from 2003-07 recouped most of the losses you allude to and created another massive asset bubble. The shadow banking system grew parabolically, real estate bubbles galore...The public sector grew exponentially, we expanded into a myriad of new government agencies that are currently a huge part of our debt problem, etc, etc...
 
Quote from denner:

Your question was moronic to say the least.

Since you've "done alot of reading", you would have known that the economy was ALREADY in the tank in the days leading up to 9/11. Greenspan had already orchestrated a series of intra-day rate cuts to try and offset the so-called "deflationary effects" of the dot.com bust.

As a so-called student of history, you would also know that our particular brand of "Military Keynesism" requires us to be engaged in near constant warfare to stimulate the economy. What better way to draw us into another prolonged war than 9/11 (not even going to argue the false flag issue, don't care to get into that aspect).

As we all know, the period from 2003-07 recouped most of the losses you allude to and created another massive asset bubble. The shadow banking system grew parabolically, real estate bubbles galore...The public sector grew exponentially, we expanded into a myriad of new government agencies that are currently a huge part of our debt problem, etc, etc...

You just made my point. We can inflate assets anytime we want with our monetary policy and have over the last 100 years. Why blow up the largest city in the US in middle of the financial center of this country during an economy that was already in the shitter? Come on man, give me something. Anything. I already understand Keynesian economics. I don't need a lecture on that. The bottom line is we could have created all the asset inflation we wanted without the risk of 9/11 blowing up in our face and believe me, there are 1000 ways from Sunday this could have blown up in their face with your theories. You still offer nothing, absolutely nothing of substance as a motive.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

You just made my point. We can inflate assets anytime we want with our monetary policy and have over the last 100 years. Why blow up the largest city in the US in middle of the financial center of this country during an economy that was already in the shitter? Come on man, give me something. Anything. I already understand Keynesian economics. I don't need a lecture on that. The bottom line is we could have created all the asset inflation we wanted without the risk of 9/11 blowing up in our face and believe me, there are 1000 ways from Sunday this could have blown up in their face with your theories. You still offer nothing, absolutely nothing of substance as a motive.

You honestly believe that we would have just decided to spend the past ten years in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. without a cause for war?

I mentioned NUMEROUS motives in the above post, but I already knew you would just flat out ignore them and essentially "talk over them" as it's your M.O.

Growth of public sector and numerous defense agencies.
Massive war spending.
You can fill in the blanks, as there are many more, including The Patriot Act and other civil liberties issues as a direct result of 9/11.
 
Quote from denner:

You honestly believe that we would have just decided to spend the past ten years in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. without a cause for war?

I mentioned NUMEROUS motives in the above post, but I already knew you would just flat out ignore them and essentially "talk over them" as it's your M.O.

Growth of public sector and numerous defense agencies.
Massive war spending.
You can fill in the blanks, as there are many more, including The Patriot Act and other civil liberties issues as a direct result of 9/11.

I am for a strong defense as much as the next guy........but
It appears 911 has spawned a whole new "growth industry", sucking capital away from the private economy, which is struggling.
 
Quote from denner:

You honestly believe that we would have just decided to spend the past ten years in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. without a cause for war?

I mentioned NUMEROUS motives in the above post, but I already knew you would just flat out ignore them and essentially "talk over them" as it's your M.O.

Growth of public sector and numerous defense agencies.
Massive war spending.
You can fill in the blanks, as there are many more, including The Patriot Act and other civil liberties issues as a direct result of 9/11.

Dude, are you not fucking aware that we spent 50 years in a cold war? And for what? Because the big bad russians were going to get us? They never fired a fucking shot on us in 50 years. Our entire foreign policy is based on preventative action, not reactive. The so called "Bush doctrine" was about getting them "over there before they come over here". We do not need, nor have we ever needed a reason to be in the middle east. That is why we are in Libya right now and Yemen. I don't recall Libya attacking us.

God damn you are clueless about history. Everything this country has done over the last 75 years has been about the "hypotheticals" and the "what if's".

Reagan's billions that we spent on star wars was all about the small possibility that the Russians might launch and air strike on us. We are on the verge of going to war with Iran. And why? Because they attacked us? No, because they might in some alternative universe use their nuclear energy program to possibly, maybe launch a strike on Israel. We don't need a 9/11. All we need is a hypothetical.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Dude, are you not fucking aware that we spent 50 years in a cold war? And for what? Because the big bad russians were going to get us? They never fired a fucking shot on us in 50 years. Our entire foreign policy is based on preventative action, not reactive. The so called "Bush doctrine" was about getting them "over there before they come over here". We do not need, nor have we ever needed a reason to be in the middle east. That is why we are in Libya right now and Yemen. I don't recall Libya attacking us.

God damn you are clueless about history. Everything this country has done over the last 75 years has been about the "hypotheticals" and the "what if's".

Reagan's billions that we spent on star wars was all about the small possibility that the Russians might launch and air strike on us. We are on the verge of going to war with Iran. And why? Because they attacked us? No, because they might in some alternative universe use their nuclear energy program to possibly, maybe launch a strike on Israel. We don't need a 9/11. All we need is a hypothetical.

Sending ground troops into remote regions for extended periods of time most certainly has had a "cause", regardless if it was legitimate or not.
 
No Motive?
Google PNAC

Quote from Maverick74:

For all you 9/11 truthers out there, did we land on the moon and can you prove it?

Whenever I talk to a 9/11 truther when you move away from the engineering aspect of it and over to the logic side, the story usually falls apart.

For example, say only 10 people in the entire world knew and planned this. I think thousands of people would need to be involved but let's say it's only 10. Where are those 10 people? They would have to be killed no? Everybody talks. Everybody! These guys would not keep their mouth shut. So where are they?

Then we get the reasons of getting into war. Since when has this country ever needed a reason for getting into war. Obama just started 3 wars without even telling anybody. Yet, we needed to go through all this trouble to invade Iraq of all places. Look, Iraq violated their UN sanctions. It's a stupid reason to go to war, but that is all congress needed. No reason to create the most elaborate, complicated scheme ever known to man to invade a country that no one in this fucking world gives two shits about.

And for what? Oil? We never got any Iraqi oil. All Saddam's oil contracts were with Total of France, not with us. We never even used any of that oil money to pay for the war.

And why not blow up a inconsequential building in Sarasota, FL or something. Why take a building that you know is going to cripple our economy and probably throw all the existing public officials out of office, which it did. Why destroy stocks markets all over the world wiping out trillions in wealth including all the rich people supposedly behind all this.

None of these questions ever get answered. I'm suppose to shut up and suspend all belief because, you know, the government is bad.

Look, nobody on ET talks about how incompetent our government is more then me. We can't deliver the mail, social security, fix bridges, run the DMV or even keep illegals from coming over here with impunity. I hate to say it, but we are going to have a lot more 9/11's in our future because Washington now can't even sit down and work out a budget. Our government is so helpless that in the world of random events, these things are bound to happen.

Of course parts of the 9/11 story don't add up. Parts of every story don't add up. They don't add because unless you are God, we are dealing with incomplete information. Whether it be as traders in the market or dealing with why your spouse or children are not talking to you. We never have the whole story. There are always contradicting clues about everything under the sun.

The conspiracy guy is filled with such hate and emptiness, that he clings to these things just to show the world that his hate of all things are justified. The hate could be towards the government, a particular party, a particular race or ethnicity or even a socioeconomic group. It's why politicians always play the race card or the class warfare card. Because it's easy to create hate and envy. In other words, it works.

I lived in NY on 9'11 and was in the WTC 45 minutes before the first plane hit. I lived it. I stood outside after the first plane hit and looked at the gaping hole in the building with flames coming out. It's something one will never forget. I was there when both towers collapsed. I will never forget the never ending snow of papers falling from the sky for hours upon hours. The smell of burning computers. The 3 inches of soot on the ground you had to walk through.

I have talked to a lot of 9/11 truthers over the years and the one thing they all have in common is an abject hate of government. Quite frankly these people really scare me. They remind me a lot of Timothy McVeigh. The problem with hate is that it over rides logic. It lives and breathes on emotion. It does not allow one ever to see or understand things clearly. While I have no love for the government, I do not hate it. People in power are just like us, only they have power. They are needy as we are, as greedy as we are, as incompetent as we are and they have the same desires as we have. There is no "they" as a group. There is no "world order" no boogeyman out to get you. They are just a bunch of people who probably could not hack it in the private sector.

As far as I can tell 9/11 did nothing for "them". Our stock markets never recovered. Our housing market collapsed. The US has now become irrelevant on the world political scene with the emergence of China, India and Brazil. But hey Saddam is dead! None of the backstory makes any sense. There is no motive. All there is is hate.

Unfortunately the hate will never go away. Now the hate has been transferred to Obama and in 2 years it might be Romney. The hate never dies, it just gets passed down to future generations. The conspiracies will never go away. It's not possible for them to go away because we will never ever have the complete story to anything.
 
Back
Top