Probably not. Therapeutics have vastly improved and infection now, though still very unpleasant to go through, is not nearly so deadly in the developed world as it was. However, treatment is far more expensive than prevention, and sociologically the best outcome is achieved by achieving as wide spread vaccination throughout the world as possible. That's because evolution of the virus puts us all at some small but finite risk, and so far as we know now, that evolution can only be stopped by denying the virus hosts.
That is a fair response.
If I thought we could deny the virus hosts I would be more inclined to agree with mandatory vaccination for adults.
But, unfortunately vaccination antibodies are only temporary and there will always be vulnerable high risks hosts for the virus. (given current technology)
I think mandatory exercise outdoors and diet restrictions for able bodied high risk would be far more effective in the long run.
Where is Bloomberg outlawing soda when you need him.