$52k gone from my IB account. What next, sue IB?

Quote from kiwi_trader:

In the mean time it would seem sensible to turn Reuse Rejected Orders OFF and to follow makloda's practice of checking the pending order tab from time to time.

Reuse Rejected Orders just means they will reappear if rejected, but in an untransmitted state.
 
Quote from lindq:

I've been running many complex equity orders through TWS every day for a year. I have yet to experience a single glitch or a second of downtime.

Anyone who would put themselves in a position of walking away from a system configuration that could put them 50K in the hole without monitoring things carefully is, IMHO, guilty until proven otherwise.

So you're saying because your anecdotal evidence of your own high volume trading means that IB is fail proof? The fact is that it only proves that YOU haven't had issues, not that this isn't a possibility.

I PERSONALLY have sat DIRECTLY in front of the screen using WEBTRADER and watched as my account FROZE and disconnected me on three occasions this month alone, costing me double digit percentage losses where I had a profit (I personally have never had any IB system failure work in my favor - perhaps others have and I'd bee interested to hear of that). Needless to say, this happened during high volume periods of market turn arounds and I confirmed with 2 other co-workers that both Etrade and Ameritrade accounts were working fine, posting accurate spreads and filling orders. When I called the DIRECT support line (after waiting for about 20 mintues) the FIRST thing the support person said was "Oh I just had someone else call about that, try Webtrader Beta", which subsequently worked - of course after the damage was done (this was also later followed up by "Well bad things happen all the time right?"....). Even in my webticket reply where they denied me any sort of compensation for this they stated that IB had now "fixed the problem" (this happened 2 times in two days a couple of weeks ago - the second time even webtrader beta didnt work and had to sell my position at market via a call to the trade desk - at least I didnt get charged as this was IB's system failure; on the phone, I could hear the phones ringing off the hook and the desk trader told me they were fielding lots of calls - hence the delay). Yet last week, I had a similar problem where the I wasn't disconnected but the bid/ask spread had disappeared and a mkt sell order was NOT getting filled. And these are not thin issues, they are the most heavily traded Index UITs - SPY, DIA, and QQQQ. So tell me, short of having a second brokerage account (which I definitely see the usefulness of for the future - I've paid a bit for this lesson and intend to learn), how were these failures anything but IB's (and admittedly so)?

Look, I'm not an IB basher. I LOVED IB when I started trading 6 months ago. SMART has good pricing, executes really fast, provides better spreads, and is easy to use. I don't have access to TWS where I work, but Webtrader was sufficient for me as all I required was real-time quotes from SMART and order filling (Ameritrade provided all I needed as a charting too). However, after being shafted out of so much money so many times in the past few weeks, forced to take losses where I had gains due SOLELY to a HUGE delay in CLOSING positions, I've grown tired and plan on moving on. But I promise you that if you are unfortunate enough to get caught in one of these system failures and don't have another brokerage account with enough liquidity to "offset" your trade entirely (which mind you will end up adding quite a bit to your cost basis), you will take a BIG loss. And in the end, IB will basically say "Screw you, you agree to the stipulation that we don't provide constant service and execution and you agreed to have an offset account in lieu of this when you joined, so your loss." Now maybe its different if you trade millions of units each month with them, but I'm not in that game.

P.S. I also know a thing or two about trading. I worked as a prop trader and currently work for a very large bank as a developer for a fairly large fund trading system, so I've had my fair exposure to playing the market - both the risks and rewards.
 
Quote from Spectre2007:

if your news trading, and your system has been working well, then someone didn't like it on the receiving end.

it will be hard to prove, but I have friends that news trade forex, with greater then 100 million a pop.

and liquidity is not available to them, and is pulled.

Trade 90 million , they'll never notice you then
 
Quote from ranceramos:


I PERSONALLY have sat DIRECTLY in front of the screen using WEBTRADER and watched as my account FROZE and disconnected me on three occasions this month alone, costing me double digit percentage losses where I had a profit (I personally have never had any IB system failure work in my favor - perhaps others have and I'd bee interested to hear of that).

Just thought I'd mention that perhaps the problem is with WebTrader specifically, because I have not had any outages at all this month using TWS. In fact I have not had TWS fail in a considerable period of time. I did have my internet connection go down on me a while back when I had a crude oil trade on. Because of this experience, I added DSL as a back up to cable. I also bought a smartphone in case both connections went down, so that I could connect via MobileTrader.

By the way, that crude oil trade worked in my favor. Stop and think about it....if you're trading in line with the trend the odds are in your favor. I'm not generally picking tops and bottoms. If you're countertrend trading, or trading extremely short term, then these are issues for you with respect to losing connection.

OldTrader
 
Quote from OldTrader:

I did have my internet connection go down on me a while back when I had a crude oil trade on. Because of this experience, I added DSL as a back up to cable. I also bought a smartphone in case both connections went down, so that I could connect via MobileTrader.

OldTrader...

Can I ask where you get a "Smartphone" at? I must be way out
of the loop because I have never heard of it or MobileTrader.
Can you give a quick explanation of what MobileTrader is?

If so, I thank you very much.
 
Quote from OldTrader:

Just thought I'd mention that perhaps the problem is with WebTrader specifically, because I have not had any outages at all this month using TWS. In fact I have not had TWS fail in a considerable period of time. I did have my internet connection go down on me a while back when I had a crude oil trade on. Because of this experience, I added DSL as a back up to cable. I also bought a smartphone in case both connections went down, so that I could connect via MobileTrader.

By the way, that crude oil trade worked in my favor. Stop and think about it....if you're trading in line with the trend the odds are in your favor. I'm not generally picking tops and bottoms. If you're countertrend trading, or trading extremely short term, then these are issues for you with respect to losing connection.

OldTrader

Mobile trader failed as well. This was the day that QQQQ started selling off dramatically from the top (about 2 weeks ago) with no news. I was with the trend, I was long, and I had a 15% net profit. I only wanted to close and by the time I got through to the trading desk and sold out, I was down 10%. Yes, I use leverage. And yes I don't hold a position if there's a profit and I see a massive sell off in my face. Perhaps it was localized to webtrader, webtrader beta, mobile trader, and a 20 minute wait on the line before I got through to the trading desk. Maybe the desk trader was lying when he said they had a ton of calls coming in and couldn't answer my questions as to why the system failed. And maybe they didn't charge me $30 for the trade because IB felt generous. And maybe I misunderstood the webticket reply that said the problem was fixed (confirming that a problem DID exist).

Believe whatever you want. If you fit into the square peg of a long term trend trader with diversification and partner offset accounts at other brokerages, IB is perfect for you. But ask yourself this: I've heard people say that this users trading was reckless, but tell me now, knowing the significant number of posts here about IB's problems, wouldn't it be reckless to assume IB will never fail you?

Like I said, I was a huge IB fan (in fact, I brought over 3 others) up until the point that their failures started costing me money. It's hard enough to make money trading index options while maintaining a full time job so I don't need my broker creating any more obstacles to this effect.
 
Quote from zzzap:

It's been 5 weeks since the incident and I don't have my money neither any clear answer. My last email to customer service is ignored for over a week.

I will describe what happened on 18th of September 2007. I will refer to my local time (GMT+01, EST+6). I attached the log file from that day as well.

Before I went outside the house around 16:45, I left my TWS running as usual since I have charting programs running during the day.
I made sure all my positions are closed and that I don't have any working orders and I went outside the house.
I came back home just before the US rate decision and found a opened position -66 GBP DEC07 contracts and few other Forex working orders.
I canceled the Forex orders and I flattened the -66 GBP DEC07 position for a huge loss (over $52000).
Looking at the audit trail, the order was filled 17:48.58 my local time.

After studying the detailed log file I found something interesting.
It seems my TWS was disconnected at 17:46:32 and then it reconnected at 17:48.52.
After it reconnected it loaded account details and it sent some orders. It send order id=1994424730 SELL 66 GBP DEC07 at 1.9889 stop 1.9889.
I'm not aware of placing such an order during the day but earlier that day at 10:30.01 I submitted a basket order and one of the orders in the basket was sell 66 GBP DEC07 at limit 1.9889.
I don't know what is the connection between these orders. So I really have no idea what went wrong and why was there after reconnecting submitted order id=1994424730 SELL 66 GBP DEC07 at 1.9889 stop 1.9889.

Examples from the log:

"RB 17:48:58:598 AWT-EventQueue-0: Performing intelligent order recovery."
..."RB 17:48:58:671 AWT-EventQueue-0: Intelligent order recovery order: id=1994424730 mod=0 liq=false sym=GBP state=jfix.FixOrderState$Inactive acct=null cum=0 conid=39656827 exch=GLOBEX compExch=null best=null time=null secType=FUT basket=Basket Window 2 ddeId=12966 avpx=1.7976931348623157E308 SELL 66 at 1.9889 stop 1.9889 jfix.FixOrderState$Inactive"...


Then it says:

"RB 17:48:58:668 AWT-EventQueue-0: Saved Order: id=1994424730 mod=0 liq=false sym=GBP state=jfix.FixOrderState$Submitted acct=null cum=0 conid=39656827 exch=GLOBEX compExch=null best=null time=null secType=FUT basket=Basket Window 2 ddeId=12966 avpx=1.7976931348623157E308 SELL 66 at 1.9889 stop 1.9889 jfix.FixOrderState$Submitted BasisPoints=1.7976931348623157E308 FacilitationPct=2147483647 StockRangeUpper=1.7976931348623157E308 TriggerMethod=Last CrossOrderId=null BasisPointsComputationType=2147483647 TriggerOutsideRth=true CrossQuantity=2147483647 StockRangeLower=1.7976931348623157E308 ReferencePriceType=None AllowedOrderQuantity=2147483647 null
RB 17:48:58:668 AWT-EventQueue-0: Corresponding CCP known order: NONE"



I was dealing with a customer support regarding this and was getting answers like "... still looking into this issue, I will keep you updated. " "I am working with out top programmers on this issue, I hope to have more information for you tomorrow. "

After almost 4 weeks I finally got some answer :
"After analysis of the TWS log files and FIX messages for the orders sent it appears that an inactive order was retransmitted, possibly when you executed a basket. The executed order clearly has your username ..."
Basically saying it's my fault and not theirs.

Wow, so they needed almost 4 weeks "working with their top programmers" to tell me what I read on day 1 from my log file. That the executed order has my username and that the order was sent from my PC.

They completely ignored that:
-the order from earlier that day to sell 66 contracts was rejected (a fact from the log)
-I didn't have any working orders and I wasn't even at home during the execution
-and most importantly that execution occurred exactly after the TWS reconnected after lost connection even the order was marketable before (mentioning some "Performing intelligent order recovery." in the log)

So I sent following email which is unanswered and ignored for over week:

"CS name,
the GBP order was rejected, it clearly shows in the audit trial. There isn't any other entry in the log showing I resubmitted the order. Please point me to it if you think otherwise.
However what is most important here is the fact that the execution occured exactly after the TWS reconnected after lost connection.
If I submited the order as you said I did, why wasn't it executed earlier? The order was marketable so it doesn't make any sence.
So I think there is some software glitch in "Intelligent order recovery" or something to do with handling orders after TWS reestablishes its connection."


So after a long story, here is my question: What to do next since IB arrogantly said after 4 weeks what was clear the very first day and they don't seem to care to figure this out, basically ignoring me?
I have been quite patient considering the $amount involved.
So what next, should I contact authorities and sue them?
Any ideas with this would be appreciated.

ZZZap,

From your intitial post I like to ask the following: You mentioned you had the computer running and where logged into TWS when you left your home. YOu said the log shows that someone/something signed you out of TWS and re-connected. Now, you also said that you use the security device. NEXT: Did you ask TWS to provide you with a proof that in fact your security device was used to log into TWS? If IB can prove that then whether its your fault or not you will NEVER recoup your lost funds. The point is, if IB can show that your security token was used to log into TWS during your absence then someone must have used it or they assume you lied to them and made up a story (I dont but they may). If IB CANNOT show that your token has been used then you should have almost a 100% chance to get your funds back, through IB directly or the court system.

I dont understand what is so complicated about this and why it takes 15 threads to discuss this (sorry if someone has mentioned this before as I simply dont have the time to read through all this just wanted to help.) If IB or your log shows that you re-connected throught he regular way into TWS (meaning by usage of your security token) then whatever may have happened then FAULT LIES ON YOUR SIDE. Who cares whether your automated system fuxxed up or you had an order in place or whatever. It maye be true it may not be, fact is from a legal standpoint you wont get your money back. Same thing with credit cards, if it can be shown that you were at the place of a credit card purchase, the pin code was used that matches with the card, then why should the credit card company care whether you or the person who used your pin code (either you told that person or were negligent about your pin) purchased something or whether you regretted having made the purchase or were simply drunk or whatever. Hope you get my point.

Sorry to hear about the loss but I feel the matter can be settled very easily with my above suggestion. So, check into this and if your log does not provide info of whether your token has been used then ask IB to provide you with such proof.
 
Quote from IluvVol:

ZZZap,


Sorry to hear about the loss but I feel the matter can be settled very easily with my above suggestion. So, check into this and if your log does not provide info of whether your token has been used then ask IB to provide you with such proof.

This is not correct. TWS disconnects and self reconnects without a new challenge to the security device (at least mine does).

A note: If you are going to put your two cents into this issue; please read the thread, and READ the LOG. It is simple.
 
Back
Top