50 Top Astronauts, Scientists Slam NASA For Promoting Man-Made Climate Change

[Brass]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Climate cycles ebb and flow over eons of time. Human contribution to such things are minor, and is not the driving factor of GW.
In short, global warming is not a serious issue when considering NG conversion. Fracking is managable and poses no problems than cannot be overcome, and are being overcome.
Couldn't care less about the politics of GW, which is all it's really about anyway. It's a made up issue for the campaign trail. Convert to NG now!!

So all the documented science is just elitist nonsense? And you can see through it all because you know better?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Climate cycles ebb and flow over eons of time. Human contribution to such things are minor, and is not the driving factor of GW...Couldn't care less about the politics of GW, which is all it's really about anyway. It's a made up issue for the campaign trail....

Exactly!

 

[pspr]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Climate cycles ebb and flow over eons of time. Human contribution to such things are minor, and is not the driving factor of GW.
In short, global warming is not a serious issue when considering NG conversion. Fracking is managable and poses no problems than cannot be overcome, and are being overcome.
Couldn't care less about the politics of GW, which is all it's really about anyway. It's a made up issue for the campaign trail. Convert to NG now!!

Ahhh ummm. I agree.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

So all the documented science is just elitist nonsense?

Mostly

 

[CaptainObvious]

Quote from Brass:

So all the documented science is just elitist nonsense? And you can see through it all because you know better?

In a word, yes! Common sense always trumps intellecual bullshit, especially when that bullshit is driven by political bias.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Climate cycles ebb and flow over eons of time. Human contribution to such things are minor, and is not the driving factor of GW.
In short, global warming is not a serious issue when considering NG conversion. Fracking is managable and poses no problems than cannot be overcome, and are being overcome.
Couldn't care less about the politics of GW, which is all it's really about anyway. It's a made up issue for the campaign trail. Convert to NG now!!

I agree.

Obama would rather send billions to his muslim buddies in the middle east than convert to NG. What's his plan? Have us all riding bikes? The libs are so in love of electric vehicles, but they don't seem to understand the electricity to charge them has to come from somewhere. Oh I forgot, they will get it from solar and wind turbines. Well, that takes care of about 5 %.

If obama is reelected, we will be facing utility bills that will put the economy into a deep tailspin, not that he will care.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Lucrum:

Mostly

And you know this how? Because Big Oil et al together with their lobbyists and on-call scientists told you otherwise?

http://one-blue-marble.com/climate-change-denial-industry.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2009/dec/07/climate-change-denial-industry

http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/denier-vs-skeptic/

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

And you know this how?...

Quote from CaptainObvious:
... Common sense always trumps intellectual bullshit, especially when that bullshit is driven by political bias.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Lucrum:

Before relying on common sense you need actual comprehension. Next time you need brain surgery, just go for the guy with common sense, and forget about the elitist snob who went through years of rigorous schooling and training to prepare for the task. Your guy will just extract your brain, slap it around a bit until the reception returns and then pop it back into your brain pan again. Good as new. And just think of all the money you'll save.

 

[jem]

Quote from futurecurrents:

You never did answer whether you think CO2 is a greenhouse gas or not.

I do not remember ever seeing the question.
Is it a greenhouse gas... by definition it is.
Does it cause warming... we see no evidence in the data that it causes warming on the earth... rather we see warming preceding its accumulation.