Right. So the laws don't make a damned bit of difference, because the deciding factor of whether there is gun violence isn't the law, but whether guns are held by criminals and people willing to do harm.
Which is what I said.
4 dead (including infant) 10 wounded in OC, CA shooting. MAGAtard suspected
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Right. So the laws don't make a damned bit of difference, because the deciding factor of whether there is gun violence isn't the law, but whether guns are held by criminals and people willing to do harm.
Which is what I said.
Right, so we can keep expanding them without effect. Works for me.
Yes-----------they did.H4$ provided a link.
So you want to expand laws that have no effect, that would actually have a negative effect?
This works for you? Why are you so interested in expanding laws that have no positive, and quite possibly a negative effect?
Are you just here to troll? If so, that's OK - we all do it. Just let me know so I can dismiss you and move on. But I was kinda hoping you and I had moved beyond that.
No-------no they didn't. Pay attention.
I don't see much negative. If the US "accidentally" became a "cleared zone" then we'd have fewer mass shootings. Sure, gun-thumpers aren't going to like it. Shrug.
I'm not trolling, you're getting excited.
I'm really not getting excited. I give you my word.
So how would the US become a "cleared zone"? I'm eager to hear this proposal. As an ardent 2A supporter, I'd be open to giving up my firearms if you have a worthy proposal on how to get criminals to give up theirs. Really.
Yes-------they did . Learn to read.
Last edited:
