but it does, limiting exposure to it it by the percentage of capitalThe 2% rule talks about risk to account capital, there's nothing to say the distance from entry to stop cannot be volatility/range based.
but it does, limiting exposure to it it by the percentage of capitalThe 2% rule talks about risk to account capital, there's nothing to say the distance from entry to stop cannot be volatility/range based.
but it does, limiting exposure to it it by the percentage of capital
and when u said "It certainly wasn't aimed at day-traders."
imho it should not be aimed at anybody![]()
if i substitute the 5 minute chart of qqq with 5 days chart one should not find the differenceI don't know about this and I'm not qualified to say, not being a day-trader, whether they should use it or not. However, reading what Alex Elder wrote its clear that he did not intend the rule to be used by day-traders.
the two approaches are mutually exclusive
if i substitute the 5 minute chart of qqq with 5 days chart one should not find the difference
which means that the distance form entry to stop (in the scale of the market) will be identical on both charts
which means the 2% rule should having similar effect and similarity should not be used
Please, don't keep making the same mistake in public. I think you may have misunderstood what we're discussing and you might think that the 2% rule means that you calculate what you can afford to lose (comprising 2% of your account) and then set a stop that is a random number of pips or points back from entry to fulfil that stipulation. This is not what Elder said but I'm guessing you don't have and haven't read his book, so you have been misled by others who haven't either. Am I right?
here u quoting dr. elder?Bearing in mind it was suggested 2% of account capital risked per trade. His aim was a low enough number that even multiple consecutive losses would not drastically damage an account.