2% Rule(s)

Risk more after you have booked profit.

Start by risking 0.25% to 0.5%

After you make some profit, increase your risk to say 0.75%. Then eventually 1% and over when you have an even bigger profit base.

Smart advice, thank you! Reason I'm asking, I'm considering switching from stocks to futures in a few months, the added leverage has me understandably spooked.
 
I Related question: is there a golden number for the amount of time at which point you can trust your win rate?
I don't think so. It will depend on your strategy. What kind of markets does it work in?

65% win rate might also be misleading as we don't know the relationship between wins and losses. What you plan to risk and what you lose are sometimes outside your control.
 
In a row, of course not, but my system tends to be a fairly reliable 65% win rate. I've yet to have more than 2 full losses in a row since I implemented it, however, that's only a few months back.

You've got a point. I personally would still be reevaluating. Money loss doesn't affect only your pnl, if youv'e had a unexpected very bad month, it can ruin your confidence, which is IMHO more important than your pnl.
 
Its not a golden number, it's the golden cycle.
If your system worked well over:
1) bear market 2) bull market 3) bear trap 4) bull trap 5) inflation 6) recession.
That's the parameter in my opinion.

Also great advice, thanks! From backtesting, it would have performed very well last year, well the first half of this year too, so I feel like that's a check on bull and bear, and I think it performs decently in trap situations because the SL hops once I gain an amount of cushion. It's roughest stretch for full losses has been the past 6 weeks, which I'm not sure what to make of yet.
 
Ok, I'm weeding out my losses here, and I'm wondering if I use a close at 2% loss rule, whether it should be based on the unmargined cost of the position/trade (the trading cost, I guess it is called), the margin cost of the position/trade, the percentage of the individual account or the percentage of the total of all accounts under management (AUM).

I suspect it is the former and 6% applies to choice 3 or percentage of individual account.

Any thoughts for margin cost of the position/trade or AUM?

As always, thanks in advance.
You only need to put in your stats into a MonteCarlo Simulator, to see. Usually a win rate over 80% is safe here because you do not get too many losses in a row, which is needed for 2% SL rule. Check this out and try yourself : https://equitycurvesimulator.com/ (it is free)
https://ayondo.com/en/tools/equity-curve-simulator
https://due-diligence-hub.com/en/tools/equity_curve_simulator
 
Ok, I'm weeding out my losses here, and I'm wondering if I use a close at 2% loss rule, whether it should be based on the unmargined cost of the position/trade (the trading cost, I guess it is called), the margin cost of the position/trade, the percentage of the individual account or the percentage of the total of all accounts under management (AUM).

I suspect it is the former and 6% applies to choice 3 or percentage of individual account.

Any thoughts for margin cost of the position/trade or AUM?

As always, thanks in advance.
Use Kelly criteria, assuming your method has positive expectancy. If it does not have, Kelly will still give you the longest time to ruin.
 
Use Kelly criteria, assuming your method has positive expectancy. If it does not have, Kelly will still give you the longest time to ruin.

By playing with simulations
Found out full kelly is very risky (Ruin)
While half kelly provides way more safety
A lot of risk takers advise for half the criterion
Especially since the inputs are dynamics & approximations.
 
To appropriate a little advice from the cinematic masterpiece "Tropic Thunder," you never ever go full kelly! Edward Thorp cautions against this strongly in his chapter of "Hedge Fund Market Wizards."
 
One thing about a 2% loss rule is that it takes a while to run out of capital.
If you apply the rule correctly and risk 2% of your capital with each trade the amount you risk decreases with each loss.
If you have a 10K account you risk 200 on trade one.
When you lose on that trade you have 9.8K remaining in that account
on your next trade you risk 196.
After 50 losses in a row you still have 3641 in capital and risk 72.83 on the next trade.
 
Back
Top