16 years 9 months, crazy fast global warming

this is for you fraudcurrents...
co2 lags warming and and man made co2 has not caused the spike in co2.

"there is no relationship between the fossil carbon emissions curve and the annual carbon increase curve."




http://notrickszone.com/2013/10/08/...emperature-is-driving-co2-and-not-vice-versa/

Caryl_11.png


The shape of the annual carbon increase resembles the shape of the global sea surface temperature (HADSST3), especially after reliable CO2 measurements began by Keeling after March 1958. Several known events are visible. Counting backwards: the 1998 El Niño, the 1994-5 El Niño, Mt Pinatubo in 1991, the 1986-7 El Niño, Mt Ruiz in 1985, El Chichon eruption in 1982, the 1972-3 El Niño, etc. Every positive peak is an El Niño and every negative peak is associated with a major volcanic eruption.

As can be seen in Figure 1, there is no relationship between the fossil carbon emissions curve and the annual carbon increase curve. That is because all the fossil emissions carbon is taken up by the biosphere or by the oceans according to Henry’s Law, and then sequestered there. The carbon in the atmosphere is controlled by temperature. This has been described by Dr. Murry Salby in this presentations at Sydney and Hamburg. He compares the CO2 curve to the integral of temperature. Here, I am going the other way mathematically, taking the differential of the CO2 curve as temperature and comparing it to known temperature data, the HADSST3 data.

- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2013/10/08/...-co2-and-not-vice-versa/#sthash.gBOX3Ftl.dpuf
 
the ice record is not a proxy? so you found a half a million year old thermometer?
what don't you lie about?

regarding the accuracy of the co2 measurements and diffusion... I presented an article a few pages back from another scientist.

2. Regarding the co2 lagging temps... at this stage no scientist disputes it. you don't have to rely on Salby. I presented a peer reviewed paper on the subject to you many times.

CO2 acummulation and dissipation lag the change in ocean temps by 9 to 12 months.

The are some agw nutter scientists trying to show that phased lag is just a coincidence and co2 really caused the lagged warming and cooling but so far there is no science...

just some speculation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_(climate)


The ice record is not a proxy for CO2 levels.

There is nothing wrong with the ice record for CO2 levels. It is certainly accurate enough to determine levels have gone up 40% at the start of the Ind. Rev.. There is zero question about it.

You are a fucking liar.
 
The ice record is not a proxy for CO2 levels.

There is nothing wrong with the ice record for CO2 levels. It is certainly accurate enough to determine levels have gone up 40% at the start of the Ind. Rev.. There is zero question about it.

You are a fucking liar.

Man has caused it's levels to go up 40%.

"...the ice record is not a proxy? so you found a half a million year old thermometer?"

That's quite interesting.
 
Back
Top