16 years 9 months, crazy fast global warming

fhl · Jun 17, 2014

futurecurrents · Jun 18, 2014

jem said:
when you can show some science showing man made co2 warming the oceans or the air let us know. feel free to link here before you win a nobel prize.
I repeat... its going to hard for you to show man made co2 causes oceans warming... because as the ocean warms they release co2.

here is the proven path.
Ocean warms... land warms... co2 rises.

I will post the link next.

Show me the science proving evolution. You can't because there isn't any.

According to you.

You must have bizarre nut job definition of science is all I can figure.

Like I said jerm. It doesn't matter what YOU think. Really.

futurecurrents · Jun 18, 2014

Trader666 said:
Only in your "mind" and in the "minds" of AGW moonbats like you.

The irony is that the more you environmental jihadists (to include so-called "climate scientists") dig in and stomp your little feet, the less people believe you. So keep up the good work

You are wrong. The consensus is overwhelming. The debate is over among the scientists.

I'm really tempted to put on ignore again Lucrum. Your just too offensively stupid. By any other name, you are still an idiot.

fhl · Jun 18, 2014

Global temperature standstill âis the biggest embarrassment for a supposed scientific âconsensusâ since Piltdown Manâ.

futurecurrents · Jun 18, 2014

fhl said:
Global temperature standstill âis the biggest embarrassment for a supposed scientific âconsensusâ since Piltdown Manâ.

No it's not, you idiot. It's really not an embarrassment at all. Temps are within predicted ranges. You are deluded and ignorant.

fhl · Jun 18, 2014

Michael Mannâs hockeystick blade is now pointed down into the ocean depths and the heat follows the blade down. This is true science and 75% of all scientists agree with this.

futurecurrents · Jun 18, 2014

fhl said:
Michael Mannâs hockeystick blade is now pointed down into the ocean depths and the heat follows the blade down. This is true science and 75% of all scientists agree with this.

No it isn't you moron.

Trader666 · Jun 18, 2014

futurecurrents said:
You are wrong. The consensus is overwhelming. The debate is over among the scientists.

"Consensus" doesn't mean jack shit, moron, and if you had a functioning brain you'd grasp that. It was "consensus" at one time that the earth was flat and center of the universe. Not to mention that no objective scientist with integrity would ever take the positions you say they all do because it's way too complicated with far too many interacting variables for the faux "certainty" AGW moonbats like you claim.

futurecurrents said:
I'm really tempted to put on ignore again Lucrum. Your just too offensively stupid. By any other name, you are still an idiot.

Lucrum? Wrong again! But feel free to take your bottle and scamper off if you can't handle my reality checks on your moonbattery.

Trader666 · Jun 18, 2014

futurecurrents said:
No it's not, you idiot. It's really not an embarrassment at all. Temps are within predicted ranges. You are deluded and ignorant.

Bullshit. You have heard of the IPCC, haven't you? Here's an excerpt from their report showing how so-called climatologists' models failed during the pause you claim didn't happen (observed temps are the thick black lines).

futurecurrents · Jun 18, 2014

Trader666 said:
"Consensus" doesn't mean jack shit, moron, and if you had a functioning brain you'd grasp that. It was "consensus" at one time that the earth was flat and center of the universe. Not to mention that no objective scientist with integrity would ever take the positions you say they all do because it's way too complicated with far too many interacting variables for the faux "certainty" AGW moonbats like you claim.

Lucrum? Wrong again! But feel free to take your bottle and scamper off if you can't handle my reality checks on your moonbattery.

Yeah ok lucrum, whatever you say. Are you too embarrassed by your former moronic persona?