16 years 9 months, crazy fast global warming

[futurecurrents]

Looks like piehole wants to run away from this one. Any of you other idiots want to answer?

So piezoe. Do you still think this recent rise in CO2 is due to anything other than man?
I see you seem to avoid the hard questions that make your "argument" look silly.

 

[futurecurrents]

Wow. I think that FC needs to go over to the linked APS Climate Change Statement Review webpage. He needs to carefully read through the "Framing Document for the Workshop" and "Complete Transcript of the Workshop" (enjoy the nearly 600 pages).

But let me provide the quick summary of what the APS found:
Climate Change research needs to continue and hopefully bias in the research is eliminated as methods improve. There is no need to rush the results of this workshop because climate change is not an imminent threat. Nearly all the IPCC assertions have proven to be incorrect including temperature rise predictions from models and ocean temperature relationships. At this point science has been unable to demonstrate that man-made climate change exists - further research is needed.

http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/climate-review.cfm

You mean THIS APS that says this? LOL

American Physical Society

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now."

 

[futurecurrents]

And no NASA did not "rewrite history". They adjusted the data to account for urban siting of weather stations. Stop repeating lies gwb. One thing to be a moron. Another to be a spreader of lies.

 

[Trader666]

Steven Goddard?! The Real Steve Goddard?

You do know that there IS no Steve Goddard right? It's a fake name just like the "science" on the site.

Futurecurrents??! The Real Futurecurrents?

You do know that there IS no futurecurrents right? It's a fake name just like the "science" he posts. <== well the science you post IS fake but NOT because of your nic

Because you're probably too dense to grasp the irony, I'll spell it out... your "logic" negates everything you write too, unless "futurecurrents" is your legal name. As usual you focus on the irrelevant and dismiss anything that conflicts with your phony AGW narrative.

And no NASA did not "rewrite history".

Bullshit. Here's more about the ringleader of the circus at NASA who was the subject of the article I posted:

James Hansen’s Former NASA Supervisor Declares Himself a Skeptic
Says Hansen ‘Embarrassed NASA’ & ‘Was Never Muzzled’
http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/in...ecord_id=1a5e6e32-802a-23ad-40ed-ecd53cd3d320

EDITORIAL: Exit Jim Hansen
NASA’s hot-air scientist cashes in
James E. Hansen will no longer be touring the country preaching his end-times hysteria, collecting a $158,832 government paycheck for it. Mr. Hansen demonstrated a certain mastery of the art of leveraging, using his position as head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies to promote a personal brand of global warming quackery. On Tuesday, Mr. Hansen announced his retirement. The vaudeville circuit won’t be the same.
Read more at: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/4/exit-jim-hansen/#ixzz34iz6zCo8

 

[Trader666]

More on the fraud that NASA has become, here's an excerpt from:

A Conversation With Apollo Astronaut Walter Cunningham About A Vital Need To Restore Climate Science Integrity

"Many of NASA’s retirees have grown increasingly concerned that GISS, a NASA organization located in a midtown Manhattan office building, was allowing its science to be politicized, compromising their credibility. Our concern, beyond damage to the NASA’s exemplary reputation, was damage to their current or former scientists and employees, and even compromising the reputation of science itself.

We developed a letter to NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden and obtained signatures from seven Apollo astronauts, several former Headquarters managers and Center directors, and 40 former management-level technical specialists. We asked that he restrain NASA from including unproven claims in public releases and on websites. Statements by NASA that man-made carbon dioxide was having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. It is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is inconsistent with NASA’s history of conducting an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements. They should be emphasizing to the media that human- caused global warming is a hypothesis, not a scientific fact."​

Read full interview at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...al-need-to-restore-climate-science-integrity/

 

[futurecurrents]

More on the fraud that NASA has become, here's an excerpt from:

A Conversation With Apollo Astronaut Walter Cunningham About A Vital Need To Restore Climate Science Integrity

"Many of NASA’s retirees have grown increasingly concerned that GISS, a NASA organization located in a midtown Manhattan office building, was allowing its science to be politicized, compromising their credibility. Our concern, beyond damage to the NASA’s exemplary reputation, was damage to their current or former scientists and employees, and even compromising the reputation of science itself.

We developed a letter to NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden and obtained signatures from seven Apollo astronauts, several former Headquarters managers and Center directors, and 40 former management-level technical specialists. We asked that he restrain NASA from including unproven claims in public releases and on websites. Statements by NASA that man-made carbon dioxide was having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. It is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is inconsistent with NASA’s history of conducting an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements. They should be emphasizing to the media that human- caused global warming is a hypothesis, not a scientific fact."​

Read full interview at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...al-need-to-restore-climate-science-integrity/

He and they are confused. Disseminating science is not political or propaganda. They are not climate scientists and they just more ignorant deluded right wing nut jobs, like you.


The basic science about man made global certainly IS settled. At least among the people that know the most about the science. We know this by various metrics. One of which is that in 2013, out of about 9000 authors of climate science papers, only one, yes one, denied it.

Those that continue to deny it, like you, are simply fools.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...s-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/

 

[fhl]

These people just think they can say and do anything.

 

[futurecurrents]

If he actually said that he was wrong. Many climatologists predicted the current rate of warming. It is well within the model's projections.

 

[Trader666]

He and they are confused. Disseminating science is not political or propaganda. They are not climate scientists and they just more ignorant deluded right wing nut jobs, like you.


The basic science about man made global certainly IS settled. At least among the people that know the most about the science. We know this by various metrics. One of which is that in 2013, out of about 9000 authors of climate science papers, only one, yes one, denied it.

Those that continue to deny it, like you, are simply fools.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...s-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/

The basic science is absolutely not settled. What's settled is that you're an idiot and many "climate scientists" are politically driven frauds. Here are 71 scientific papers that negate the claim made in the very first paragraph of the blog you linked to. http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/71-new-papers-reported-in-2013.html

Explain how a gas that's only 1/2500th of the atmosphere, which leads and lags temperatures and has been uncoupled from temperatures for centuries at a time, trumps ALL other physical, chemical and biological processes that govern the planet and "controls the temps." You can't and neither can "climate scientists, " not even the ones at the AMA.

P.S. Consensus even if real doesn't mean jack squat. You're an idiot for "thinking" that too.

 

[Trader666]

If he actually said that he was wrong.

Maybe you can ask your inflatable Obama boyfriend tonight.

Many climatologists predicted the current rate of warming. It is well within the model's projections.

Nonsense. The models of the so-called "climatologists" have failed spectacularly.