16 years 9 months, crazy fast global warming

[Trader666]

Here's another flaw in the moonbattery that you peddle, diaper boy.

The earth is 4.54 billion years old but EPICA Dome C only goes back 800,000 years. To an idiot like you, that may seem like a very long time. But if you transform the earth's lifespan into a 24 hour clock, 800,000 years is only 15 seconds.

So it's asinine to pretend that the last 15 seconds are in any way "normal" for the planet, especially since CO2 concentrations have been 10 to 15 times higher than they are now in the relatively recent past.

Not to mention that nobody can explain how a gas that's only 1/2500th of the atmosphere, which leads and lags temperatures and has been uncoupled from temperatures for 800 years at a time, trumps ALL other physical, chemical and biological processes that govern the planet.

 

[futurecurrents]

Here's another flaw in the moonbattery that you peddle, diaper boy.

The earth is 4.54 billion years old but EPICA Dome C only goes back 800,000 years. To an idiot like you, that may seem like a very long time. But if you transform the earth's lifespan into a 24 hour clock 800,000 years is only 15 seconds.

So it's asinine to pretend that the last 15 seconds are in any way "normal" for the planet, especially since CO2 concentrations have been 10 to 15 times higher than they are now in the relatively recent past .

Not to mention that nobody can explain how a gas that's only 1/2500th of the atmosphere, which leads and lags temperatures and has been uncoupled from temperatures for 800 years at a time, trumps ALL other physical, chemical and biological processes that govern the planet and "controls the temps."

Only a moron assumes that potency is related to concentration. So of course you do.

"From the foregoing, it is clear that CO2 is the key atmospheric gas that exerts principal control (80% of the non-condensing GHG forcing) over the strength of the terrestrial greenhouse effect. Water vapor and clouds are fast-acting feedback effects, and as such, they are controlled by the radiative forcing supplied by the non-condensing GHGs.

The bottom line is that atmospheric carbon dioxide acts as a thermostat in regulating the temperature of Earth. "

Try reading real science for once instead of your cartoons and right wing denialist propaganda.......fool.

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/


And the point of the CO2 chart above is to show that the current rise is not natural......dipstick.

 

[futurecurrents]

leftist drones are a comedy routine. What at the odds that the only policy Obama has correct is climate change?

I work from the facts...
Science shows CO2 lags change in temps.. see the peer reviewed paper below.

"The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11–12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5-10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes."

See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008

[/QUOTE][/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

Like a broken record. Except you don't know it's both broken, and irrelevant. You are making yourself look even more like a clueless idiot.

 

[fhl]

Does anybody need more evidence that global warming is a hoax? I keep asking why these people aren't in jail.
------------------------------------------

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

"... how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world’s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA’s US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data."

[The unadjusted data]"... show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on “fabricated” data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...e-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html

 

[futurecurrents]

Does anybody need more evidence that global warming is a hoax? I keep asking why these people aren't in jail.
------------------------------------------

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

"... how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world’s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA’s US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data."

[The unadjusted data]"... show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on “fabricated” data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...e-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html

It doesn't matter to you that this is bullshit does it? Besides, we are interested in GLOBAL temps, not the US. Idiot.

 

[futurecurrents]

 

[fhl]

It doesn't matter to you that this is complete bullshit based on fabricated data that came from computer projections and not real data?


JAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jem]

as if the data showing C02 lags warming and cooling would go out of style?
just about every lie or piece of boulder dash (I saw a soccer announcer use this word and I am going to try and stop cursing here.) you post is countered by that fact....

so why should I change it.
especially when you fall back to your consensus boulder dash.


[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

Like a broken record. Except you don't know it's both broken, and irrelevant. You are making yourself look even more like a clueless idiot.[/QUOTE]

 

[Trader666]

Only a moron assumes that potency is related to concentration. So of course you do.

"From the foregoing, it is clear that CO2 is the key atmospheric gas that exerts principal control (80% of the non-condensing GHG forcing) over the strength of the terrestrial greenhouse effect. Water vapor and clouds are fast-acting feedback effects, and as such, they are controlled by the radiative forcing supplied by the non-condensing GHGs.

The bottom line is that atmospheric carbon dioxide acts as a thermostat in regulating the temperature of Earth. "

Try reading real science for once instead of your cartoons and right wing denialist propaganda.......fool.

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/

Speaking of morons... are you even capable of an original thought? All I've seen you do is mindlessly parrot whatever agrees with your moonbat political views.

Only a moron like you doesn't question the absurd (that 1/2500th of the atmosphere trumps all else). Especially since warming's paused and the models have failed. No... you swallow whatever the Muslim outreachers/AGW zealots at NASA feed you. And the fact that they have cooked the books before (see below) is irrelevant to you, as long as it fits your pointy headed agenda.

Your link is old, from 2010. Since then we have:

71 new papers reported in 2013 demonstrating the Sun controls climate, not man-made CO2
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/71-new-papers-reported-in-2013.html

Also in 2013, even the Muslim outreachers/AGW zealots at NASA have been forced to admit that the sun plays a greater role than they'd realized:

There is, however, a dawning realization among researchers that even these apparently tiny [solar] variations can have a significant effect on terrestrial climate. A new report issued by the National Research Council (NRC), "The Effects of Solar Variability on Earth's Climate," lays out some of the surprisingly complex ways that solar activity can make itself felt on our planet.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/

And the point of the CO2 chart above is to show that the current rise is not natural......dipstick.

Which doesn't change the far more substantive point that it's asinine to pretend that the last 15 seconds of the earth's 24 hour lifespan are in any way "normal" for the planet, especially since CO2 concentrations have been 10 to 15 times higher than they are now in the relatively recent past.

 

[gwb-trading]

At some point someone needs to be held responsible for this nonsense. I am certainly hoping at some point prosecutors will start charging those who have faked data to drive political agendas with felony charges. Obviously their faulty research was designed to appease political supporters to drive more grants of tax-payer money in their direction in return for fabricated predetermined results, while causing billions of dollars to be wasted on inappropriate public policy that only enabled people like Al Gore to get rich.

Does anybody need more evidence that global warming is a hoax? I keep asking why these people aren't in jail.
------------------------------------------

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

"... how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world’s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA’s US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data."

[The unadjusted data]"... show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on “fabricated” data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...e-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html