LOL
14th Amendment Time -- It's long overdue to keep insurrectionists off the ballot
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
And the other half learned.50% of the ET political forum stopped right there.
Hey Canadian boomer, take Foreskin, the other Canadian boomer, and get lost. Both of you are terrible at this. I guess its because you live in a monarchy.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court seems poised to reject attempts to kick former President Donald Trump off the 2024 ballot, with conservative and liberal justices in apparent agreement in a case that puts them at the heart of a presidential election.
In addition, Joe Biden gets a pass over his handling of classified data. Not a single charge and the lame excuse is he is an old man with a poor memory? Yet, this fool is in charge of the nuclear missile launch codes and is waging war in Ukraine, Middle East and soon with China? Yeah, the deep state is protecting his ass no matter what he does but, President Donald Trump is levied 90 charges over the same classified data. The US Supreme Court needs to man up and uphold the US constitution as written and should slap down all these bogus cases designed to bleed President Donald Trump of financial resources to use in the election. Election interference of the highest order.
ET Canadian trolls think they are doing fine. Justin Trudeau is about to give you idiots a big slap in the face but, I would not spoil the surprise for you. For all your interference in US politics, your illustrious leader has a lot of surprises for you idiots. Maybe, you should focus on Canada and its problems? And you fools cheering the millions upon millions crossing the US borders should know that the Canadian borders can easily be overrun by millions of illegals from the US. When there is an overflow of illegals in the US, they can easily crossover the Canadian border and Justin Trudeau is just as willing to let them all in. How do you like them apples?
Ah ha hah hah ha. If the supreme Court doesn't understand, why would I expect you to? I wouldn't.
For others here, the point is, and this flies right over the heads of lawyers and courts, the Constitution of the United States is as clear on this point as it can possibly be. You can't hold Federal Office if you took an oath to support or protect and defend (defend = support) the Constitution and then subsequently engaged in, or aided or abetted an insurrection. Colorado must disqualify Trump from appearing on Colorado's ballots or else Colorado will violate Constitutional law, which all States must follow! No one has any recourse against Colorado if they exclude Trump from their Ballots, Colorado must do this or be in violation of Constitutional law --- the highest law in the land.
There is a strong chance that Colorado's actions will be rejected by SCOTUS 8-1 or 9-0.
I agree. That would be a big mistake of course. It seems I am the only one here and, by logical extension, must be one of the few beyond the Colorado Supreme Court that can read what's written without reading something that is not there. Section three of our 14th Amendment could not be more clear or straight forward, and it make perfect sense from a logical standpoint; yet it appears that no one except myself can read and understand its plain, clear requirement that anyone aspiring to public office must meet.
Section 5 says that Congreff has the authority to execute Section 3. Colorado judges cannot invoke Section 3.