13 Russian nationals indicted for interfering in US elections

UsualName said:
You’re a bit shifty today. A week ago you were sure Mueller would indict Trump. Today the chances “are not good.”

I am watching you guys gleefully make this indictment of a tranche of Russian contractors into the be all end all of the investigation. It’s not. We’ll see how you guys feel when the rest of the indictments come out.

What I did find interesting is that these contractors did make their way into the Trump campaign although these contractors did so by deception. I would like to see the level coordination they achieved.
More...

Why do you think this was released on a Friday afternoon?

http://politicaldictionary.com/words/friday-news-dump/
 
UsualName said:
You’re a bit shifty today. A week ago you were sure Mueller would indict Trump. Today the chances “are not good.”

.
More...

That's all you got for an issue?

It is true that my language varies depending on whether we are talking about prosecution and conviction versus indictment which are vastly different. He may get an indictment just to compel trumps testimony and/or get him to plead or not plead the fifth- and any idiot can get an indictment. And I also said that some pundits speculate that he might just get an indictment and then hand it over to the justice department and let them do what they will with it- and I said I could see that happening because it would be a pussy move and Mueller is a pussy. But I have always said that he will not be prosecuted and convicted of obstruction and that if he is it will be reversed on appeal, as I have always said. And that continues to be my position.

I do realize that this "indictment" versus "conviction" thing is too nuanced for the binary mind, so it could appear shifty to your jaundiced mind.

But I see where you are coming from today. You have butt hurt that the indictments were not rougher on Camp Trump so are flailing around to make some point, even though you don't know what it is.

We are here for you.

That's all you got for an issue?

It is true that my language varies depending on whether we are talking about prosecution and conviction versus indictment which are vastly different. He may get an indictment just to compel trumps testimony and/or get him to plead or not plead the fifth- and any idiot can get an indictment. And I also said that some pundits speculate that he might just get an indictment and then hand it over to the justice department and let them do what they will with it- and I said I could see that happening because it would be a pussy move and Mueller is a pussy. But I have always said that he will not be prosecuted and convicted of obstruction and that if he is it will be reversed on appeal, as I have always said. And that continues to be my position.

I do realize that this "indictment" versus "conviction" thing is too nuanced for the binary mind, so it could appear shifty to your jaundiced mind.

But I see where you are coming from today. You have butt hurt that the indictments were not rougher on Camp Trump so are flailing around to make some point, even though you don't know what it is.

We are here for you.

Also, could you post where I said I was sure he would be indicted versus talking about the possibility. I will examine that.
 
Last edited:
Arnie said:
Please, just stop.
It's emabarrassing to watch.
You're like the little prick we've all met that can never admit when he is wrong.
More...

About what? It is a perfect day to release on the new not my president's weekend.

You lack flair.

Thoughts and prayers for you Arnie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top