Like dtrader98 already showed,
each time just invert the prediction of the poor 10% strategy, then you will be correct 90% of the time.
And of course 90% is better than the 60% of the other strategy.
Simple maths & logic, folks... ;-)
Yes, a strategy that has a 10% success rate is indeed better than another strategy that has 60% success rate.
One just needs to invert the predictions of the poor strategy: if it predicts that tomorrow will be an UP day, then you take exactly the opposite (ie. DOWN), and vice-versa...
If you apply this logic then you will be right in 90% of all the cases.
The result of the voting up until now is very poor: only 1 of the 5 voters has it correct... ;-)
each time just invert the prediction of the poor 10% strategy, then you will be correct 90% of the time.
And of course 90% is better than the 60% of the other strategy.
Simple maths & logic, folks... ;-)
Yes, a strategy that has a 10% success rate is indeed better than another strategy that has 60% success rate.
One just needs to invert the predictions of the poor strategy: if it predicts that tomorrow will be an UP day, then you take exactly the opposite (ie. DOWN), and vice-versa...
If you apply this logic then you will be right in 90% of all the cases.
The result of the voting up until now is very poor: only 1 of the 5 voters has it correct... ;-)
Last edited:
