1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

(Reuters) - Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager said on Wednesday he wanted the European Commission to look for alternatives to a proposed financial transaction tax, which studies had shown to be inefficient and not helpful in stabilising the financial sector.

De Jager said in a letter to parliament he wanted the commission to look for alternatives, including a financial activities tax, a bank tax, or a stamp duty.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/21/eurozone-transactiontax-dutch-idUSWEA608020120321
 
to add to that article: in the letter that was written the dutch not only say they want to look for alternatives, but they also wrote they are now adopting an official anti-ftt opinion. altough there could be new elections around the corner because of budget cuts trouble, for now this is good news (altough not completely unexpected).
 
Quote from Explorer:

(Reuters) - Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager said on Wednesday he wanted the European Commission to look for alternatives to a proposed financial transaction tax, which studies had shown to be inefficient and not helpful in stabilising the financial sector.

De Jager said in a letter to parliament he wanted the commission to look for alternatives, including a financial activities tax, a bank tax, or a stamp duty.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/21/eurozone-transactiontax-dutch-idUSWEA608020120321
what is the difference between a financial activities tax, a bank tax, or a stamp duty. and the ftt?
 
Quote from Explorer:

(Reuters) - Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager said on Wednesday he wanted the European Commission to look for alternatives to a proposed financial transaction tax, which studies had shown to be inefficient and not helpful in stabilising the financial sector.

De Jager said in a letter to parliament he wanted the commission to look for alternatives, including a financial activities tax, a bank tax, or a stamp duty.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/21/eurozone-transactiontax-dutch-idUSWEA608020120321

Very good news indeed. Just yesterday Germany ruled out a stamp duty so I guess it's down to to the FAT tax or a bank tax. Gee we've come full circle and we're back where we started. I would think the EU could possibly get behind a direct tax on the banks as many of them (including Britain) have recently implemented one.

-Guru
 
Quote from zdreg:

what is the difference between a financial activities tax, a bank tax, or a stamp duty. and the ftt?

FAT : An extra tax on corporate revenues for all financial institutions.

Bank Tax : A tax on liabilities or profits for all banks presenting a systemic risk( and thus may receive help from taxpayers )

Stamp Tax : FTT at the exchange level( the non exempted traders disappear but they can still trade foreign or untaxed products )
 
Quote from listedguru:

Very good news indeed. So no EU or EZ ftt and Germany has also ruled out a stamp tax. Wow this is quite impressive. Poor France (LOL).

Well, the French did vote for Sarkozy. Great to see a true democracy at work where the politicians deliver what the people want...

Le idiots!
 


"While the Dutch government subscribes to the goal of a transaction tax, the current proposal doesn’t contribute to financial stability and will hurt the Dutch pension sector, De Jager wrote in a letter to parliament today."

Another wobbly response from the Netherlands. They could have used the MEA and DCB studies to drive a stake through the heart of the FTT. Instead they give Barroso and Semeta and yet another opportunity to say the EU-FTT is just around the corner.
 
Desperate idiots:

Barroso: Transaction Tax halves EU contribution

(google translation)

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - A tax on financial transactions, part of the contribution of EU states to the European budget in half. That states the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso on Thursday.
For the Netherlands that an annual savings of up to 2.6 billion in 2020, says the committee. Barroso pointed to the first preliminary estimates of the impact of the tax on the income of the European Union. The levy is controversial within the EU.

[...]

//edit more:

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120322-710291.html

BRUSSELS (Dow Jones)--The U.K. government would see its direct contribution to the European Union budget reduced by EUR7.6 billion by 2020 if the European Union's proposal for a regional transaction tax to fund Brussels' spending is agreed, Budget Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski said Thursday.

The Commission's proposal, a centerpiece of its 2014-2020 budget plans, faces a tough fight for survival. A number of countries are skeptical about a financial transactions tax, including the U.K. and Sweden. Many governments also want to maintain member state control of the money Brussels receives.

The Commission estimates that by 2020 a financial transactions tax levied on shares, bonds and derivatives could generate EUR81 billion annually. The Commission says a third of that would be reserved for member states while Brussels would automatically receive the other two thirds, some EUR54 billion.

According to the Commission's numbers, the French contribution to the EU budget would fall by EUR8.8 billion, Germany would see its payments fall EUR10.7 billion and Italy would provide EUR6.5 billion less.

Still every euro saved on payments to Brussels would be one euro surrendered by national governments if a transactions tax was introduced.

The new numbers come as the battle heats up over the 2014-20 budget settlement, which must be agreed by December and on the transactions tax. Nine countries have said they want to press ahead with a tax, including France and Germany. At the same time, France, Germany and the U.K. are insisting that the EU budget should not rise by more than inflation in coming years.

The Commission has long wanted to increase the amount of funds directly earmarked for Brussels, ensuring a return to the regional bloc's earlier years when EU "own resources" funded most EU expenditure.

However member states are skeptical about that. Member state officials argue that control of those funds gives national governments greater sway over EU spending and priorities.

The Commission hopes that by offering national governments the chance to tell voters they are slashing the amount of money they sent to Brussels, the EU's executive will win over some member states for their plans.

"We are coming with some striking figures to assist the debate," Lewandowski said at a press conference.

-By Laurence Norman, Dow Jones Newswires; +32 (0)2 741 1481; laurence.norman@dowjones.com
 
Back
Top