Quote from Explorer:
If they don't do better than that, someone in London or Zurich or anywhere else will do better than that, and take that business from them.
Quote from bjw:
full story
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...-wipe-10-from-stocks-valuation-hsbc-says.html
The proposed tax would amount to about 1 percent of a typical transaction, as every purchase involves about 10 steps and each would be subject to the tariff, Down said in a telephone interview.
Why are you trying to force the tax upon every one without choice, and as for banks/market makers, I have recently read that high frequency traders could potentially pay up up 50% per year due to there high turn over rate, market makers without being given exemptions, as well as subjecting every stage of a trade to the tax will be liable for something very similar.
The costs of this will be transfered to the end users
In terms of your later points, the 50% rate you mention is a guess-timate based on people trading shares over and over again
Such as market makers and dealers, because its there job to provide a market and trade over and over again.
This high frequency trading is something many people think is socially and economically useless or indeed bad, so taxing it heavily would not be a bad idea.
Yet market making and dealing is neither economically useless or bad
Den, even in the financial markets there are people who say high frequency trading is a bad idea, eg Lord Adair Turner who first described it as âsocially uselessâ
To reach the 50% tax rate you cite, people would be trading each share 10,000 times a year, or once every 12 minutes of the working day. And yet still they would make a profit!
Market making is not investing, it is facilitating trade and as far as I am aware under the EU proposals there are no exemptions for such entitys, trading a share 10,000 times a year to hit 50%???
LLOY.LS traded 160642563 yesterday alone.....