1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Comments from Duncan Niederauer (head of nyx) regarding ftt:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ny...failed-merger-effort-2012-02-10?siteid=yhoof2

While Niederauer said that France is likely to embrace some manner of “stamp duty” charge linked to financial transactions, in its final form this is not likely to have a big impact on NYSE Euronext’s Paris-based exchange. Italy, Spain, Portugal and Belgium are also looking at various forms of financial transaction taxes, but a euro zone-wide levy is “increasingly unlikely,” Niederauer said.

Also this:


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/NYSE-sees-financial-theflyonthewall-2222481995.html?x=0

NYSE sees financial transaction tax as first envisioned 'increasingly unlikely'.

Places low probability on FTT in Europe that would severly impact business...
 
Quote from Explorer:

If they don't do better than that, someone in London or Zurich or anywhere else will do better than that, and take that business from them.

And it would be better... As France would have a lot more problems to litigate them based on their "intellectual property" of the instruments( I would be interested in hearing a real legal advice on this crap ).
 

Interesting point here (from the above story):

The proposed tax would amount to about 1 percent of a typical transaction, as every purchase involves about 10 steps and each would be subject to the tariff, Down said in a telephone interview. It would therefore increase the cost of equity, or the amount a company theoretically pays investors in its shares, to about 9.5 percent from 8.5 percent and erode the value of stocks, the analysts estimated.
 
The proposed tax would amount to about 1 percent of a typical transaction, as every purchase involves about 10 steps and each would be subject to the tariff, Down said in a telephone interview.

It is a lot, the issue was bought up with a big time campaigner who I believe is working with the EU in some manner, although there was mention of short term trading being subject to a lower tax I get the disturbing feeling he does not know the difference between a person making a market and high frequency trading.

Why are you trying to force the tax upon every one without choice, and as for banks/market makers, I have recently read that high frequency traders could potentially pay up up 50% per year due to there high turn over rate, market makers without being given exemptions, as well as subjecting every stage of a trade to the tax will be liable for something very similar.

The costs of this will be transfered to the end users



In terms of your later points, the 50% rate you mention is a guess-timate based on people trading shares over and over again


Such as market makers and dealers, because its there job to provide a market and trade over and over again.


This high frequency trading is something many people think is socially and economically useless or indeed bad, so taxing it heavily would not be a bad idea.


Yet market making and dealing is neither economically useless or bad


Den, even in the financial markets there are people who say high frequency trading is a bad idea, eg Lord Adair Turner who first described it as “socially useless”

To reach the 50% tax rate you cite, people would be trading each share 10,000 times a year, or once every 12 minutes of the working day. And yet still they would make a profit!


Market making is not investing, it is facilitating trade and as far as I am aware under the EU proposals there are no exemptions for such entitys, trading a share 10,000 times a year to hit 50%???

LLOY.LS traded 160642563 yesterday alone.....


http://touchstoneblog.org.uk /2012/02/cameron-plans-to-let-europe-take-21bn-a-year-from-the-city-and-we-get-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-64506
 
Well Obama's fiscal 2013 budget is out and thank goodness I didn't see any mention of the ftt. Lot's of other tax hikes in there (capital gains, dividends, and carried interest). I guess the spend and tax ways will continue:(

The good news is this budget is DOA in the Senate.

-Guru
 
Back
Top