1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Quote from lindq:

The common refrain now is "I'd like to see an FTT in my country, so long as we all do it together."

I keep coming up with the image of a bunch of lemmings standing at the precipice of a steep ledge, squeeking, "You go first...then I'll follow."

Perfect! If there are any artists in this forum, perhaps they'll draw it for us. It could be the official poster for the FTT.
 
Anyone ever add the 0.25% the "Let Wall Street Pay for Wall Street's Bailout of 2009", which had a 91% unfavorable rating, proposed tax to their strategies?

It's catastrophic! Much like me trying to find a hyper-leveraged way to bet 1000 years of world gdp that FTT is harmful to all countries who support it.

I say let them, then we'll see how quickly those supporters lose their political credibility as the desolate waste of trillions and billions of shares leaving the country as a direct result of such economic foolishness and idiocy.

Tobin takes the cake for dumbest economist of all time, though not quite as stupid as Giffen calling goods that increase in demand due to increasing price, when that never happens and the literally weakest argument for an example of giffen good happened under famine conditions in Ireland in the 19th century and there is no other example in the history of recorded time where that has ever been the case. Tobin and Giffen might have some credibility to the loony leftist or socialist economists and journalists that don't know any better, but when it comes to FTT please help me find a way to short their markets in that proportion before they ban that, too.

Anyone see the Bovespa losing 20+% since FTT?
 
Ratings Cut Deals Blow to Sarkozy - WSJ.com
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204409004577159132175102196.html

My Comment on WSJ:

Sarkozy must withdraw his Financial-Transaction Tax proposal, as it was a contributing reason to S&P's ratings cut on France._

It's really a Socialist Transaction Tax as Socialists are demanding it. Sarkozy is behind in the polls, and he needs to propose this Socialist Transaction Tax to appeal to bank-bashing-independent voters and hold the Socialist opposition at bay. The Socialist presidential-contender Mr. Hollande is equally to blame. Both Sarkozy and Hollande should agree to scrap the FTT proposal.

S&P said they won't raise ratings back for these EU countries downgraded without new signs of growth. FTT reduces growth by 1.76% per EU studies.

S&P said it doesn't like diverging competitiveness across the EU. Passing FTT in France only, which Sarkozy is calling for, will make financial-sector competitiveness a major problem in France. Bankers, traders and funds will flea to London, as the UK opted out of the new EU-fiscal compact because they said they will veto FTT on an EU-wide basis. Passing_FTT in some countries, and not EU or G-20-wide makes diverging competitiveness a major issue for ratings agencies.

S&P is watching the French and German financial sectors to see if they get worse. S&P said this could trigger a downgrade for Germany too.

S&P said disintegration of the EU and euro zone hurts, and it contributed to this downgrade. FTT makes disintegration and infighting worse. FTT is the main reason why the UK would not sign the EU fiscal compact, which threw EU governance into disarray.

FTT will surely accelerate rating agency downgrades, and it's reckless for Sarkozy, Merkel and socialists to keep it on the table.

Sarkozy is losing his reelection by trying to appeal to socialists. Why not change course and explain how the free market can generate growth and lead France to recovery of its rating, economy and jobs.

PS. Let's keep focusing our anti-FTT efforts on France. This S&P downgrade must give them pause on some policies, even if they claim otherwise. Try to get this above message in all the French and EU media and hopefully France and others will see that FTT is much more trouble than they erroneously think it might be worth.
 
tumblr_lxskp2Y0xf1qz4c9do1_400.png
 
Le Monde reports on the contentious debate over whether a financial transaction tax, if one is ever adopted, would have much in common with Robin Hood.

“The NGO Oxfam worries about the change in [French President] Nicolas Sarkozy’s position, noting that he had said at the G20 summit in early November ‘a significant portion, the majority or the totality of the revenue must go to development.’ But he has since changed his mind, according to Oxfam’s Luc Lamprière: ‘His reference to the European Commission directive is a bad sign since it calls for the tax to ‘progressively replace national contributions to the EU budget,’ leaving the idea of financing development and the fight against climate change as a mere footnote.

How ever ruthless the charity's have been with there deception when it comes to pushing for this tax, you heart does still bleed for them when you see they have realized the truth and are being taken for mugs...right....right
 
One of the best independent articles on FTT I've read so far. Extensive, well-argued, unbiased article, and much worth to read.
Fortunately it's in German, because especially all those stubborn German FTT proponents really should read this.

www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/finanztransaktionssteuer-die-robin-hood-steuer-11606838.html ('Frankfurter Allgemeine', a well known German newspaper)

Google translation of the last part:

Conclusion

Of the four goals that Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy to pursue the financial transaction tax, they reach a maximum of two:

* First, they take money, for example for the EU budget - albeit not as much as hoped for, especially if David Cameron does not go along in the UK.
* Secondly, this just in Germany and France win with a transaction tax, the hearts of their voters. This is true only for the two countries. In the rest of the EU's other ideas for financial market regulation are more popular than the transaction tax.

And rightly so. The tax will not solve Europe's problems. Although the banks are asked to pay, but they do not come, but before sending depositors. The tax also does not help to calm the stock market. There are new dangers: the transaction tax may even ensures that the swings in the stock markets still grow. If it runs entirely unfavorable, the company could also arise from the real economy the money.

"A transaction tax hits the belly of the citizens," the economist Kenneth Rogoff wrote in a statement. "But the tax is so harmful in the long term, it is perhaps still better to do nothing." Rogoff It is no friend of the banks. ". There are many reasons to get excited about the financial industry, and they must change the way they work really" Nevertheless, he concludes: "The transaction tax is not a solution to Europe's problems."
 
Back
Top