Lael Brainard, Treasury Department Undersecretary for International Affairs, recently said: âWe're very much in sync with Europe on their goal of ensuring that large financial institutions bear their fair share of the burden, but the US-proposed 'responsibility fee' would better deter the kind of risky behavior that led to the crisis as well as ensure that large financial institutions and not retail investors bear the burden."
If this is the official position of the White House, then they're against the FTT and in favor of what you're suggesting. Apparently they want to limit it to financial institutions and not hit retail traders. How they would do that is anybody's guess.
If this is the official position of the White House, then they're against the FTT and in favor of what you're suggesting. Apparently they want to limit it to financial institutions and not hit retail traders. How they would do that is anybody's guess.
Quote from zdreg:
do u there believe is no work around.? how about an sec fee that is the equivalent of an ftt?