1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States formally offered its backing on Tuesday for French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde to take over the top job at the International Monetary Fund, ensuring a win for her over Mexico's Central Bank Governor Agustin Carstens.


http://uk.news.yahoo.com/frances-lagarde-poised-become-next-imf-chief-013358350.html


Quote from benwm:

Seems the US is supporting the appointment of Lagarde for IMF chief position. Not good news.
 
Interesting article . . .

High frequency trading will adapt to 'Robin Hood' tax

http://www.efinancialnews.com/story...robin-hood-tax-ftt?mod=sectionheadlines-IB-TT

Hirander Misra, chief executive officer and co-founder of Algo Technologies, a low latency connectivity provider based in London and New York, said the proposed FTT could accelerate one trend where some HFT firms have moved away from using speed-based strategies to seek out arbitrage opportunities across trading platforms.

Instead, sophisticated HFT firms will be encouraged to execute cross-asset class trading strategies, exploiting complex correlations between different asset classes, he said.

“In these markets it’s all about adaptability. Firms capitalise on new regulatory or market structures,” he said. “Strategies will develop to work within the confines of the rules so the tax does not apply. Rather than an emphasis on micro-second trading, the focus could shift towards more predictability and a slightly longer time horizon, in which securities are held longer,” said Misra.

Benoit Raimond, an HFT trader and chief executive officer of Raimond Capital, a London-based fund manager, believes that HFT firms that provide liquidity to markets would continue to make about the same margins under a FTT regime. However, the broader market-wide drop in volumes that would result from an FTT would likely hit their overall revenues.
 
Quote from sheda:

A unilateral financial transactions tax by the eurozone is becoming increasingly likely, according to Financial Times Deutschland, after Jean-Claude Juncker, who had previous been sceptical, is now fully in favour. Under discussion is a transactions tax of 0.1% to 0.5% of turnover. The pressure on this issue comes from the European Council. The European Commission has been sceptical, and pressure is now growing on Algirdas Semeta, the tax commission to develop a proposal. Juncker said he had preferred to levy such a tax at G20 level, but since this is not possible, the eurozone, should press ahead. The problem with any such proposal is to prevent transaction being routed into offshore financial centres, such as Singapore or Shanghai. And since any proposal on tax requires unanimity, it is very likely that those in favour of the tax would have to invoke the enhanced cooperation procedures under the Lisbon Treaty. But that would be a lengthy process, and unlikely to get the tax ready for 2012.

http://www.globalsocialjustice.eu/i...financial-times-germany&catid=2:news&Itemid=8

WoW only 1000 a round trip!

:D

0.1% to 0.5% is so completely absurd I wonder if the EC is deliberately setting a level ridiculously high just in order to lay a trap for the UK and other skeptics likely to veto it.

If the UK were to criticise the proposed rates, it risks getting sucked into arguments about how big the tax should be instead of whether the tax should happen at all.

Maybe Barroso's thinking is that by starting out with hugely inflated rates the door is then open for the EC to then offer a massively lower rate "in order to help our British friends". Britain inevitably says no and all of a sudden Britain is the bad guy again, and (maybe) feels under pressure.

Hopefully the UK will just take the simple line that Geithner took two years ago _ i.e. that (regardless of the rate) a transaction tax "is not something we are prepared to support".
 
Quote from MrPowerBallad:

Instead, sophisticated HFT firms will be encouraged to execute cross-asset class trading strategies, exploiting complex correlations between different asset classes, he said.

[/B]

I don't know what they are smoking but stat arb, futures spread ... are one of the most fee incentive strategies. They are making a fraction of what the tax would be.
 
even trading a very modest 30k shares of an avg $35 stock which is 1 hr of trading for many day traders you're talking $1750 a day at .25% plus ecn and sec fees plus up to 35% in cap gains. almost every high vol trader would be history. many traders vol is at least 1 mil shares x $35 stock is $87,500 per month. . even a .01 % is 30 k or so. I bet vol would drop 80% easy.
 
EU Looks to Financial-Sector Tax
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576413960092611804.html

My Comment:

An EU-wide financial-transaction tax (FTT) is a pipe dream. The UK and Sweden said they will vote no and it requires unanimous consent. Banks will pressure politicians to block a financial-activities tax (FAT).

Why is EU-capital Brussels making a money-power-tax grab when it should be cutting waste, fraud and abuse in it's run-away spending? An unwanted EU-wide-direct-federal tax grab signals a collapse of the EU at the same that PIIGS debt crisis does the same. The EU is being pressured from both sides.
 
My understanding is that banks lend money over night from the interbank market to balance there books - The interest rate is 0.5% per annum.

A transaction tax of 0.05% added on top of this per night is going to make lending in this market a lot more expensive and the cost will have to be handed directly to mortgage holders and those who received loans of any type. That"s going to be a substantial amount per year.

Also I don"t see how they could ever pass this with wall street and institutions being exempt, one of the main behavioural programming codes- oops I mean one of the main motivations behind this that was an original idea of the people in support is "making wall street pay"...they cant go from making wall street pay to making every one but wall street pay.

Some people think this will give an edge to the banks, removing small firms and trading "competition" from the market but this is not a retail industry fighting for a customer base I don"t see how that would be so. Shares are not plants they don"t grow they need masses of people to be in demand for them and to pump them up, yes the banks have the buying power to replicate that but then no one to sell to...

June 27 (Bloomberg) -- European Union regulators may propose a levy on financial transactions under the EU budget beginning in 2014 to diversify sources of revenue.

"It's one of the options," David Boublil, tax spokesman of the European Commission, the 27-nation EU's regulatory arm in Brussels, said today by telephone. "It's not decided yet."

The commission intends this week to propose the EU's spending program for the seven years starting in 2014. National governments finance 70 percent of the EU budget, leading the commission to seek ways of diversifying sources of revenue.

The spending ceiling for the EU in 2007-2013 totals 864 billion euros ($1.2 trillion), or around 1 percent of the region's gross domestic product.

Any proposal for a financial-transaction tax in the 2014- 2020 budget would need the unanimous support of EU governments, Boublil said. Such a levy is sometimes called a Tobin tax after James Tobin, the Nobel Prize-winning economist who first suggested the idea in 1971.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic...-36J42K1VAA091B053M3MU3M8L4.DTL#ixzz1QfWo2M88



EU Looks to Financial-Sector Tax

BRUSSELS—The European Commission is set to propose a Europe-wide tax on the financial sector this week as Brussels seeks to boost the revenues it can lay direct claim to as part of a multiyear European Union budget plan.

The Commission is expected to name the financial sector duty as one of two or three taxes it will propose to raise the EU's so-called own resources —revenue earmarked directly for the EU budget, according to people familiar with the matter.

However the EU's executive arm must tread carefully if it hopes to see the proposal adopted. With member states wielding veto powers on most tax issues, the EU executive must find a way around the longstanding opposition of several governments to the plan.

On Wednesday, the European Commission begins its deliberations on its 2014-20 budget proposal. An announcement is expected Wednesday afternoon or Thursday morning. The proposals will kick off what is expected to be 18 months of grueling negotiations between member states, the European parliament and the EU executive.

Last week European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso confirmed he will make a proposal on a financial sector tax after the summer.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576413960092611804.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

The wording is less direct, less aggressive, less " i have the right and you"l do as I say" I sense no foaming at the mouth financial illiterate self righteous we know best screams within those articles.

And so what if Americans backing that women for IMF head - can she force a single country in the world to implement such a tax? Can she turn the hole organization around just because she is in favour?
 
Quote from seasideheights:

"With the EU now concentrating its energy on the financial transaction tax, plans for a so-called financial activity tax have been put on hold. In contrast to a financial transaction tax, a financial activity tax targets bank profits and bonuses."

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-new...on-financial-transactions-20110629-1gpn1.html

It sounds like the Brits arn't going to let this happen:

Cameron will lead fight against Brussels' plan for new 'EU Tax."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...nst-brussels-plan-for-new-eu-tax-2304085.html

-Guru
 
Back
Top