thats crazy. I don't know how these people get put into office. They have no idea as to the tremendous reprocussions to something like this.
uhm I've said that 30 pages ago on this thread. And Fee is NOT the right term. FINE is better because it shows it to be punative.Quote from seasideheights:
This is another good one from Scott's blog replies that questions whether it should even be called a tax. The new name there is nice. Also the penalty theme with a touch of middle class theme.
"It's not a tax. It's a PARTICIPATION FEE. They want to fine you for participating in the markets. It has nothing to do with what you earn on a trade. Even if you LOSE MONEY on an investment, you still get penalized for investing in the USA stock market."
CNBC is the enemy, what did you expect.Quote from traderbigt:
You gotta emphasize its penalty. I just heard Geithner no longer opposes the tax. Anyone worried yet?
These insane Leftist nutball "economists" are totally clueless about economics, yet CNBC keeps giving them forums to spout their drivel. I am sick to death of this sh*t.
Quote from traderbigt:
You gotta emphasize its penalty. I just heard Geithner no longer opposes the tax. Anyone worried yet?
These insane Leftist nutball "economists" are totally clueless about economics, yet CNBC keeps giving them forums to spout their drivel. I am sick to death of this sh*t.