Search results

Religion being the procrastination of reality, you're probably already well overdosed in the art of needless delay. Though it'll likely be your subject matter which you love - pseudoscience. As in this thread and others you seem to have great affection for arguing faulty statements by...

Mere assertion. There is nothing scientific whatsoever to confirm or even suggest anything is so called 'tuned' to any decimal places. Quite obviously, non scientific mere assertion would not do that. The Standard Model is incomplete, always has been, still is. In terms of The Scientific...

Nope. 2+2 still doesn't = 3 no matter how many times you post it....

You've been pasting bs, that's not writing. There is no ' and hence'. The precision needed to find Higgs has no basis in non scientific precision tuning of the universe assertions. It's blatantly obvious assertions are not about precision. So you're suggesting all the time god was just...

Lol. What Science Seriously , what are you afraid of that makes you keep pasting bs from a religious website that says something even its source does not. That's not science. You were the one to bring up how a fallacious appeal to authority would be made, so why keep making them? When...

Well Jem's posts certainly are familiar I'll give you that. Familiarly disfunctional.

I've already given reason why you're talking out your ass and you keep doing it, oblivious to logic or fact. 2+2 does not =3 no matter how often you, or your god site, says it does.

Who wouldn't understand fallacious appeals to authority reading your stuff? You are forever making them. After concocting so many, apparently even you do. There it is. Another in a long line of your fallacious appeals to authority. Right before your very eyes. Quite clearly The Economist...

Doesn't care for authority. Don't make me laugh. He is forever appealing to authority, linking to anything cut&paste that can be misunderstood in favor of a imaginary creator. Empty or duff cartridges may be massive fire in your book but not in most peoples. Just sayin' you maybe, but it's...

It is then of course, as I said. Your link was to 'the biblically based flagship publication of the United Church of God' The Good News, NOT The Economist. From your god slanted approach you've tried to wrongly and falsely assert that because Higgs showed up as required for the Standard...

Lol cheerleader . In your dreams.

The link in that opening "statement" of yours is to a religious website called The Good News, NOT The Economist. The Good News is ...'the biblically based flagship publication of the United Church of God' http://www.ucg.org/science/god-scie...es-fine-tuning/ ...your link. You made NO...

found 1 Earth which also appeared very flat. Still does to flat earthers.

controversial claims (2) from an article in a religious! website (+2)... to make a flawed conclusion...."the standard model of the universe can be used to predict where the Higgs Boson would show up... and that therefore many of the constants of the universe are tuned to 20 or more decimal...

Compact version of where debate with Jem goes. jem: 2+2=3 here's why 2+2 is not ..... jem: liar. Black is white no... jem: lying fucking troll liar. Wrong is right look... jem: you said 2+2=5. You lying trolling sockpuppet jeez... jem: 2+2=3

Darwinian evolution in non-life protein. Indeed.

The only things you have been mouthing off about is.. 1. a lie you keep repeating like a madperson about what I haven't said. Your insanity is in telling the same lie again and again as if expecting to change the fact that you are lying. and 2. that there is no scientific pathway from non...

Bingo!

There it is, in a nutshell, indeed. Lying again about something I have not said. As a consummate liar you can't help yourself. No, you don't have to alter statements. But you do. Here is a known pathway .... "Dr Clarke said: "There are a lot of fundamental questions about the origins of...

No it isn't. This is about why certain people in a thread about the Real Reason Romney Lost, are more concerned with putting up silly pious irrational religious comments than tackle the way in which a candidate, who should have had a good run at a real challenge, did little else but flip flop...