Higgs Boson - The evidence of God Particle
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Religion being the procrastination of reality, you're probably already well overdosed in the art of needless delay.
Though it'll likely be your subject matter which you love - pseudoscience.
As in this thread and others you seem to have great affection for arguing faulty statements by repeatedly banging them against untrue claims like a deranged parrot would bang its beak against its cage.
Apparently some like yourself crave that as a form of delusion to blind themselves in religious belief. Much easier to dodge and put off that way, than having to understand things properly.
Contrary to what you suppose, Higgs may extend and indeed revolutionize The Standard Model, whilst the absurd faulty statements and untrue claims, along with the infantility of false argument and ignorance that underlies instistence for a supernatural god to 'tune' the unverse, are rendered even more utterly irrelvant than is already the case.
It kinda makes you wonder the purpose or more accurately the purposelessness of people like stu.
I mean if I didn't believe in leprechauns I doubt I would spend the whole of my existence trying to prove the case to others.
I mean think about it , having an OCD of attempting to prove God does not exist is the most powerful demonstration of control over his life possible. It's hilarious, he's like a monk totally consumed by thoughts of God. How is that for rational
I mean if I didn't believe in leprechauns I doubt I would spend the whole of my existence trying to prove the case to others.
I mean think about it , having an OCD of attempting to prove God does not exist is the most powerful demonstration of control over his life possible. It's hilarious, he's like a monk totally consumed by thoughts of God. How is that for rational
I'm not the one consumed by a God that I claim doesn't exist.
For all intents he is as real to you as anybody else, and the zeal for your antipathy proves it.
stu you are a clown.
I let the economist and scientists explain the fine tuning to you.
I let the economist tell you it took 20 constants tuned to 32 places to find the higgs..
That is not me lying that is science and math.
You are lying about the science.
Higgs did not extend the model.
It was predicted in the sixties by higgs...
using incredibly precise math.
And finding the boson confirmed the model.
if the LHcollider did not find the higgs boson it would have called the whole standard model into question. That is not an extension of the model... it was confirmation.
I let the economist and scientists explain the fine tuning to you.
I let the economist tell you it took 20 constants tuned to 32 places to find the higgs..
That is not me lying that is science and math.
You are lying about the science.
Higgs did not extend the model.
It was predicted in the sixties by higgs...
using incredibly precise math.
And finding the boson confirmed the model.
if the LHcollider did not find the higgs boson it would have called the whole standard model into question. That is not an extension of the model... it was confirmation.