Search results

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these...

Cherry Picking Most claims that the IPCC models have failed are based on surface temperature changes over the past 15 years (1998–2012). During that period, temperatures have risen about 50 percent more slowly than the multi-model average, but have remained within the range of individual...

The argument with the denier sheep is not even a fair fight. From the National Snow and Ice Data Center https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/ice_sheets.html

For the denier nutters who think it's the sun......one wonders if they have ANY critical thinking skills at all. Such sheep they are.

All the sea ice talk aside, it is quite clear that really when it comes to Antarctic ice and sea levels, sea ice is not the most important thing to measure. In Antarctica, the largest and most important ice mass is the land ice of the West Antarctic and East Antarctic ice sheets. Therefore...

Antarctic sea ice IS increasing!!!!! Global warming is now global cooling!!!!! All the denier morons start dancing!!!! But ..... One must also be careful how you interpret trends in Antarctic sea ice. Currently this ice is increasing overall and has been for years but is this the...

the editorial stance of which broadly reflects that of the Daily Mail, being to the right wing of mainstream British politics and typically supporting the UK Conservative Party.[12] MailOnline articles tend to be dominated by pictures rather than long-form journalism.[2] A major component of the...

Got anything from an authoritative source? No? Didn't think so. Until you do just shut the fuck up. Everything you posted is wrong.

The quote is from a well written factual article at the link. So of course you won't read it because you are a deluded sheep.

All in all, the IPCC models do an impressive job accurately representing and projecting changes in the global climate, contrary to contrarian claims. In fact, the IPCC global surface warming projections have performed much better than predictions made by climate contrarians ...

Yes.

Read and learn idiot http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate

Here you go lucrum/666, one slip up and this incarnation will also go on ignore. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate

You don't learn well do you? The temp adjustment was proper and done by scientists, and who cares about a short time period of only US temps except for ignorant delude righties?

Yes. There is a consensus among the scientists that the science is correct. Why this is so confusing to the right wing nut jobs here is a mystery. Maybe because they are listening to Crichton. Who was what again? Oh yeah, a GW denying pinhead author, LOL.

Once again your ignorance and delusion is showing. The models are NOT wrong nor are they politically driven. You are very confused.

Don't bother him with small details like that.

"But this year’s El Niño might represent a turning point. The oscillation between El Niño and La Niña, El Niño’s cold-water cousin, is part of the reason for slower atmospheric warming. Sea surface temperatures in the Pacific rise during El Niño and ultimately heat up the atmosphere in...

Your brain is cooling.