Fraudcurrents - NOAA just proved you were a fool

All the sea ice talk aside, it is quite clear that really when it comes to Antarctic ice and sea levels, sea ice is not the most important thing to measure. In Antarctica, the largest and most important ice mass is the land ice of the West Antarctic and East Antarctic ice sheets.

Therefore, how is Antarctic land ice doing?

F5.large.jpg


Figure 2: Estimates of total Antarctic land ice changes and approximate sea level contributions using a combination of different measurement techniques (Shepherd, 2012). Shaded areas represent the estimate uncertainty (1-sigma).

Estimates of recent changes in Antarctic land ice (Figure 2, bottom panel) show an increasing contribution to sea level with time, although not as fast a rate or acceleration as Greenland. Between 1992 and 2011, the Antarctic Ice Sheets overall lost 1350 giga-tonnes (Gt) or 1,350,000,000,000 tonnes into the oceans, at an average rate of 70 Gt per year (Gt/yr). Because a reduction in mass of 360 Gt/year represents an annual global-average sea level rise of 1 mm, these estimates equate to an increase in global-average sea levels by 0.19 mm/yr.
 
Spare us your propaganda from skepticalscience, which you tried to sneak by without providing a link. :p Here's how objective they are:

71 new papers reported in 2013 demonstrating the Sun controls climate, not man-made CO2
These papers don't exist according to paid climate propagandist John Cook of SS
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/71-new-papers-reported-in-2013.html

All the sea ice talk aside, it is quite clear that really when it comes to Antarctic ice and sea levels, sea ice is not the most important thing to measure. In Antarctica, the largest and most important ice mass is the land ice of the West Antarctic and East Antarctic ice sheets.

Therefore, how is Antarctic land ice doing?

F5.large.jpg


Figure 2: Estimates of total Antarctic land ice changes and approximate sea level contributions using a combination of different measurement techniques (Shepherd, 2012). Shaded areas represent the estimate uncertainty (1-sigma).

Estimates of recent changes in Antarctic land ice (Figure 2, bottom panel) show an increasing contribution to sea level with time, although not as fast a rate or acceleration as Greenland. Between 1992 and 2011, the Antarctic Ice Sheets overall lost 1350 giga-tonnes (Gt) or 1,350,000,000,000 tonnes into the oceans, at an average rate of 70 Gt per year (Gt/yr). Because a reduction in mass of 360 Gt/year represents an annual global-average sea level rise of 1 mm, these estimates equate to an increase in global-average sea levels by 0.19 mm/yr.
 
lol that does explain alot. I actually had zero points in the feeling category on Meyers Briggs. No wonder I cannot relate to the guy.

ENTJ:

Extrovert 18
Introvert 10

Sensing 8
Intuitive 14

Thinking 33
Feeling 0

Judgement 27
Perception 2

Yup, I'm an ENTP. Not judgmental as a knee jerk thingy, only after lots of thought. I just go from A to B without ruffling any more feathers than needs be.

It's taken me a very long time to get it that these non-thinking people actually are just going to be what they are and do what they do until they breathe their last...

I was married to an INFJ. One commentator said they are "witches looking for a chance to call security" and I had to laugh because that pretty well says it. INFJ's CANNOT LEARN ANY NEW INFORMATION WITHOUT A COMPLETE ADJUSTMENT OF THEIR VALUE SYSTEM! If that isn't the epitome of "fuct up", I don't know what is. I told her for decades to not drink the sodas, not eat the manufactured foods, to hydrate, etc... now she is on chemo and dialysis and hates me because her insurance isn't good enough! My thoughts to her: "see'ya, wouldn't wannabeya"
 
If everyone just quotes Lucrum and Trader666, Fraudcake will just put everyone on ignore, and have no one left to discuss anything with. Personally, I think that would be hilarious. He'll go away through his own actions.
 
futurecunts hasn't shown up in this thread? Did I finally put him on ignore maybe? Is it beneath his dignity to answer factual posts maybe, not enough emotional content to make it rise to his level? Futurecunt, that info comes from NOAA, it's funded with Public Monies. We know that in your thinking that makes it "clean and righteous", the only private sector monies that were involved were the ones that were extracted from our pockets but said monies were cleansed by cycling through the sticky fingers of the Public Sector. Get over to the NOAA and see what they are saying.
 
Back
Top